Table 4.

The degree of public perception of the industrial heritage landscape of Tao Sichuan.

Standard layers (mean)	Index layer corresponding number	Mean value of the index layer
Historical value A1 (3.8875)	Question 1 (“Does the park convey a sense of history?”)	3.8589
	Question 2 (“What is the degree of integrity of preservation of building structures, machinery, equipment, and production materials?”)	4.1564
	Question 3 (“Is there much information retained by history?”)	3.6779
Artistic value A2 (4.8354)	Question 4 (“Is the architectural style outstanding?”)	4.8313
	Question 5 (“What is the artistic feeling of the overall park?”)	4.8436
	Question 6 (“Is the outdoor landscape sketch satisfactory?”)	4.8313
Technical value A3 (3.3129)	Question 7 (“Are you familiar with the ceramic production line or ceramic production process?”)	3.6411
	Question 8 (“Are you familiar with the production function of Tao Sichuan?”)	3.3313
	Question 9 (“Do you understand the construction technology of existing building workshops?”)	2.9663
Social value A4 (4.9714)	Question 10 (“Does the landscape in the park improves the image of Jingdezhen?)	5.3834
	Question 11 (“Does landscape spread ceramic culture?”)	4.9970
	Question 12 (“Does the landscape in the park carries an industrial spirit?”)	4.5337
Economic value A5 (4.2969)	Question 13 (“Is the park transportation convenient?”)	4.6656
	Question 14 (“Does Tao Sichuan's current transition succeed?”)	4.9601
	Question 15 (16) (“What is your desire to spend? Are employment opportunities provided?”)	3.2654