Skip to main content
. 2023 May 8;19(8):727–740. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00726-6

Table 2.

Summary of meta-analysis results comparing the neurocognitive outcomes of children and adolescents with brain tumors treated with XRT or PBRT

Outcome Studiesa
(participants)
Z-score (95% CI) P-value I2 Begg’s P
Full scale intelligence quotient 8 (n = 512) 0.75 (0.52, 0.99)  < 0.001 0 0.451
Verbal comprehension index 7 (n = 385) 0.46 (0.20, 0.73) 0.001 0 0.382
Perceptual reasoning index 8 (n = 439) 0.69 (0.44, 0.94)  < 0.001 0 0.193
Working memory index 9 (n = 464) 0.35 (0.07, 0.63) 0.016b 0 0.301
Processing speed index 9 (n = 468) 0.29 (0.01, 0.56) 0.046b 0 0.377
Visual motor integration 5 (n = 318) 0.52 (0.15, 0.88) 0.006 3.5 0.110
Attention 9 (n = 468) 0.29 (0.01, 0.57) 0.044b 0 0.377
Verbal memory 4 (n = 262) 0.64 (0.31, 0.96)  < 0.001 0 0.367
Non-verbal memory 3 (n = 144) 0.43 (− 0.53, 1.40) 0.377 0 0.148
Verbal working memory 9 (n = 464) 0.35 (0.08, 0.63) 0.012b 0 0.174

Data are shown as Z-scores. Significant P-values are in bold font. aThe study by Child et al., was counted as two studies as it included two control and interventions groups. bThis result did not remain significant in sensitivity analyses. Results statistically significant are shown in bold characters. CI confidence interval, MD mean difference, XRT x-ray radiotherapy group, PBRT proton beam radiation therapy