Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;13:11396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28632-x

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Different processing underlies face recognition expertise in super-recognizers and forensic examiners. (A): An example trial from the Expertise in Facial Comparison Test40 (EFCT). These images show different people. (B): Super-recognizers demonstrate superior accuracy after seeing face images for just 2 s, suggesting that fast, intuitive processes underlie their expertise whereas examiners’ expertise only becomes apparent when given sufficient time to deploy their slow, feature-by-feature comparison strategy. Violin plots show the distribution of performance for student controls, forensic examiners and super-recognizers on the upright conditions of the EFCT. Red lines show group means.