Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;13:11396. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28632-x

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Super-recognizers show consistent and face-specific identification expertise. Violin plots show the distribution of performance for super-recognizers and controls on the test battery. Red lines show group means. Super-recognizers outperformed controls on a battery of standardised tests measuring face matching (GFMT38, Models71), face recognition memory (CFMT + 78, CFMT-Aus 73), and general face identification abilities (UNSW Face Test74). To a lesser extent, they were also better than controls on both the Primate Matching Test and Fingerprint Matching Test but not the MFFT test, suggesting some overlapping ability across domains in perceptual matching. We are unable to show the primate and fingerprint stimuli used in the test. Example primate faces were obtained from Pixabay (https://pixabay.com/images/search/monkey%20face/) and are released under the Pixabay License. Fingerprint images are by Metrónomo and licenced under SelfCC BY-SA 2.5 AR (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ar/deed.en).