Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;14:4203. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39825-3

Fig. 6. Modelling results.

Fig. 6

a Mean shock probability ratings separately for N = 89 participants better fitted by 1-state (purple) and n-state (green) models. The thick line denotes mean of each group, the shading reflects the standard error of the mean, b Mean BIC scores for the two models. BIC scores were demeaned to make sessions visually comparable. The conditions contain N = 36, N = 88 and N = 37 data points respectively. c Positive association between relative model fit and trait anxiety in the 90/10 session, r(36) = 0.39, CI = [0.07, 0.63], p = 0.017 (p = 0.023 for cross-validated correlation). The plot shows the result for N = 37 participants analyzed using Pearson’s correlation, two-tailed, p-value Bonferroni-corrected for multiple comparisons.