Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 13;5(7):371–375. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11573

Table 2.

Distribution of the next therapeutic steps by case race and ethnicity among 159 respondents

Black case Hispanic case White case
Case 1 N = 54 N = 53 N = 52
Add low‐dose prednisone 1 (1.9%) 3 (5.7%) 1 (1.9%)
Continue current therapy and monitoring for now 6 (11.1%) 3 (5.7%) 5 (9.6%)
Increase dose of oral methotrexate 6 (11.1%) 7 (13.2%) 10 (19.2%)
Start a biologic therapy 41 (75.9%) 37 (69.8%) 34 (65.4%)
Switch methotrexate to leflunomide 0 (0%) 3 (5.7%) 2 (3.8%)
Case 2 N = 57 N = 52 N = 50
Continue current therapy and prescribe antidiarrheal medication 8 (14.0%) 11 (21.2%) 10 (20.0%)
Continue current therapy and reassess in 3 mo 6 (10.5%) 5 (9.6%) 10 (20.0%)
Start combination leflunomide and methotrexate at lower doses and stop sulfasalazine 5 (8.8%) 2 (3.8%) 3 (6.0%)
Stop sulfasalazine and start a biologic therapy 35 (61.4%) 32 (61.5%) 26 (52.0%)
Switch from leflunomide back to methotrexate at a lower dose and stop sulfasalazine 3 (5.3%) 2 (3.8%) 1 (2.0%)
Case 3 N = 53 N = 53 N = 53
Add hydroxychloroquine 15 (28.3%) 10 (18.9%) 12 (22.6%)
Add low‐dose prednisone 1 (1.9%) 1 (1.9%) 3 (5.7%)
Start a biologic therapy 35 (66.0%) 36 (67.9%) 32 (60.4%)
Switch methotrexate to leflunomide 0 (0%) 4 (7.5%) 3 (5.7%)
Continue current therapy and monitoring for now 2 (3.8%) 2 (3.8%) 3 (5.7%)
Case 4 N = 54 N = 53 N = 52
Add prednisone 3 (5.6%) 1 (1.9%) 1 (1.9%)
Start a biologic therapy 50 (92.6%) 52 (98.1%) 50 (96.2%)
Increase dose of methotrexate 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.9%)
Switch methotrexate to leflunomide 1 (1.9%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)