Table 1.
Size of the ulcer
| Sl. No. | Size of the Ulcer | Mean ± Standard deviation | Student Independent t-Test p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Study Groups | Study Groups | |||
| A | B | |||
| 1. | Visit-2 | 2.85±1.04 | 2.7±1.031 | 0.650 |
| 2. | Visit-3 | 2.85±1.04 | 2.7±1.031 | 0.650 |
| 3. | Visit-4 | 2.55±0.826 | 2.7±1.031 | 0.614 |
| 4. | Visit-5 | 2.3±0.657 | 2.55±0.945 | 0.337 |
| 5. | Visit-6 | 2.1±0.526 | 2.45±0.83 | 0.310 |
| 6. | Visit-7 | 1.85±0.813 | 2.15±0.813 | 0.250 |
| 7. | Visit-8 | 1.5±0.513 | 1.95±0.826 | 0.045 |
| 8. | Visit-9 | 1.00±0.00 | 1.9±0.788 | <0.001 |
| One way ANOVA | P<0.001 | P=0.007 | - | |
Each row and column represents the Mean ± SD of the size of the ulcer. The differences in Mean ± SD values showed a significant difference between the study groups (P<0.001). P<0.05 was considered statistically substantial as derived from the descriptive method followed by a two-tailed Student’s t-test. SD, Standard deviation.