Table 3. Quality assessment of longitudinal studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
Author and year | Salvago et al., 2022 [12] | Jeong et al., 2021 [14] | Niu et al., 2020 [18] | Labaeka et al., 2018 [20] | Poonual et al., 2016 [22] |
Selection | |||||
Representativeness of the exposed cohort | * | * | * | * | * |
Selection of the nonexposed cohort | * | * | * | * | * |
Ascertainment of exposure | * | X | * | * | * |
Demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study | * | * | * | * | * |
Comparability | |||||
Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis controlled for confounders | ** | * | * | ** | * |
Outcome | |||||
Assessment of outcome | * | * | X | * | * |
Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur? | * | * | * | * | X |
Adequacy of the follow-up of cohorts | * | * | * | * | * |
Total score | 9 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
Overall grade | Good | Good | Good | Good | Good |