Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Apr 14;6(7):975–987. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01316-8

Fig. 5 |. Distribution of evaluation scores for semantic projection.

Fig. 5 |

a, Pearson’s correlation. b, Pairwise order consistency. Histograms across 52 category–feature pairs for linear correlations (left) and pairwise order consistency (OCp; right) between semantic projection ratings and human judgements (n=25 participants per category–feature pair), before (black) and after (blue) adjustment for inter-rater reliability in ratings. Points show category–feature pairs, vertical lines show medians and semi-transparent rectangles show 95% confidence intervals. Curves show approximated data distributions, with density (in arbitrary units) on the y axis.