Extended Data Fig. 1 |. Correspondence between human judgments and semantic projection using FastText.

Conventions are the same as in Fig. 3 in the manuscript. Descriptive statistics across all tested pairs: (a) Pearson’s correlation: med = 0.41 ($C{l}_{95}=0.29-0.50$, $IQR=0.26-0.57$), adjusted med = 0.44 ($C{l}_{95}=0.35-0.53$, $IQR=0.29-0.60$). (b) $O{C}_p$: med = 64% ($C{l}_{95}=61-68\text{\%}$, $IQR=57-73\text{\%}$), adjusted med = 73% ($C{l}_{95}=70-78\text{\%}$, $IQR=67-81\text{\%}$).