Extended Data Fig. 2 |. Correspondence between human judgments and semantic projection using word2vec.

Conventions are the same as in Fig. 3 in the manuscript. Descriptive statistics across all tested pairs: (a) Pearson’s correlation: med = 0.33 ($C{l}_{95}=0.27-0.40$, $IQR=0.22-0.44$), adjusted med = 0.35 ($C{l}_{95}=0.28-0.43$, $IQR=0.24-0.47$). (b) $O{C}_p$: med = 62% ($C{l}_{95}=57-65\text{\%}$, $IQR=55-67\text{\%}$), adjusted med = 71% ($C{l}_{95}=65-74\text{\%}$, $IQR=63-78\text{\%}$).