Extended Data Fig. 3 |. Correspondence between human judgments and semantic projection using ELMo.

Conventions are the same as in Fig. 3 in the manuscript. Descriptive statistics across all tested pairs: (a) Pearson’s correlation: med = 0.26 ($C{l}_{95}=0.20-0.36$, $IQR=0.14-0.43$), adjusted med = 0.31 ($C{I}_{95}=0.21-0.41$, $IQR=0.15-0.45$). (b) $O{C}_p$: med = 59% ($C{l}_{95}=57-63\text{\%}$, $IQR=55-66\text{\%}$), adjusted med = 70% ($C{l}_{95}=65-73\text{\%}$, $IQR=63-76\text{\%}$).