Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 28;149(8):4611–4621. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04356-9

Table 2.

Hazard ratio for relapse-free and overall survival according to multivariable Cox regression models

Relapse-free survival Overall survival
Hazard ratio 95% CI p Hazard ratio 95% CI p
Cytarabine dose
 HiDAC Reference Reference
 IDAC 0.900 0.650–1.246 0.530 1.094 0.721–1.660 0.670
ELN risk group
 Intermediate Reference Reference
 Favorable 0.704 0.514–0.965 0.029 0.435 0.273–0.694  < 0.001
 Adverse 1.147 0.745–1.767 0.540 1.771 0.988–3.174 0.055
Number of 7 + 3 induction cycles
 1 cycle 1.603 1.195–2.151 0.002 1.758 1.221–2.532 0.002
 2 cycles Reference Reference
Age (per 10 years) 1.012 0.999–1.025 0.120 1.021 1.001—1.041 0.036
Sex, Male 1.151 0.860–1.539 0.350 1.163 0.788–1.718 0.450
ECOG, > 1 1.071 0.704–1.629 0.750 1.653 1.001–2.728 0.050
HCT-CI, > 1 1.220 0.887–1.677 0.220 1.425 0.968–2.099 0.072
AML type
de novo Reference Reference
 sAML 0.807 0.462–1.410 0.450 1.033 0.548–1.947 0.920
 tAML 1.266 0.795–2.015 0.320 1.215 0.657–2.246 0.540

HiDAC/IDAC high-dose/intermediate-dose cytarabine; sAML secondary AML; tAML treatment-related AML; ECOG clinical performance status according to ECOG criteria; HCT-CI hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index; 7 + 3 induction treatment with standard-dose cytarabine for 7 d and daunorubicin for 3 d; CR1 first complete remission