Table 3.
Multilevel Model of Linkage in Hourly EDA Moderated by Overall Own Relationship Satisfaction
Variables | b | SE | p | CI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed Effects | ||||
| ||||
Intercept (γ00) | 5.68 | 0.51 | < .001 | [4.68, 6.69] |
Hourly own EDA (γ10k) | 0.71 | 0.13 | < .001 | [0.46, 0.96] |
Overall own relationship satisfaction (γ01k) | −0.56 | 0.43 | .19 | [−1.41, 0.29] |
Hourly own EDA × overall own relationship satisfaction (γ11k) | −0.07 | 0.02 | < .001 | [−0.10, −0.03] |
| ||||
Random Effects | ||||
| ||||
Residual (eijk) | 23.11 | 0.72 | ||
Between person intercept (u0jk) | 22.56 | 3.51 | ||
Between couple intercept (r00k) | 14.18 | 4.10 |
Note. Bold = significant hypothesized effect; EDA = electrodermal activity; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; R2 (S&B) = Snijders & Bosker percent variance explained; Level 2 ICC = .38, Level 3 ICC = .24; R2 (S&B) = 3.00%.