Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD005196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005196.pub4

Comparison 1. Modified CHAMOMA versus MAC.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Death 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Response to treatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Remission with primary treatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 Remission with secondary treatment 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Total toxicity (grade 3/4) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4 Haematological toxicity (grade 3/4) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected