Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 16;14:124. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01475-w

Table 2.

Diagnostic performances in the (a) per-patient and (b) per-lesion analyses

Expertise Sensitivity% (95% CI) Specificity% (95% CI) NPV% (95% CI) PPV% (95% CI) Accuracy% (95% CI) TP TN FP FN
(a) Per-patient
All patients Junior radiologist 83.6 (77.5–88.6) 96.6 (94.4–98.1) 92.8 (90.3–94.7) 91.9 (87.0–95.0) 92.5 (90.1–94.5) 158 398 14 31
Nuclear medicine 81.0 (74.6–86.3) 98.5 (96.9–99.5) 91.9 (89.4–93.8) 96.2 (92.0–98.3) 93.0 (90.7–94.9) 153 406 6 36
Senior radiologist 89.4 (84.1–93.4) 98.5 (96.9–99.5) 95.3 (93.1–96.9) 96.6 (92.7–98.4) 95.7 (93.7–97.2) 169 406 6 20
Patients referred for initial staging Junior radiologist 78.3 (66.7–87.3) 98.6 (95.0–99.8) 90.3 (85.6–93.6) 96.4 (87.2–99.3) 91.9 (87.4–95.2) 54 140 2 15
Nuclear medicine 76.8 (65.1–86.1) 98.6 (95.0–99.8) 89.7 (85.1–93.1) 96.4 (86.9–99.1) 91.5 (86.9–94.9) 53 140 2 16
Senior radiologist 88.4 (78.4–94.9) 99.3 (96.1–100) 94.6 (90.2–97.1) 98.4 (89.6–99.8) 95.7 (92.1–98.0) 61 141 1 8
Patients referred after biochemical recurrence Junior radiologist 86.7 (79.3–92.2) 95.6 (92.4–97.7) 94.2 (91.1–96.2) 89.7 (83.2–93.8) 92.8 (89.8–95.2) 104 258 12 16
Nuclear medicine 83.3 (75.4–89.5) 98.5 (96.3–99.6) 93.0 (89.9–95.2) 96.2 (90.4–98.5) 93.9 (91.0–96.0) 100 266 4 20
Senior radiologist 90.0 (83.2–94.7) 98.6 (95.7–99.4) 95.7 (92.7–97.4) 95.6 (90.1–98.1) 95.6 (93.1–97.4) 108 265 5 12
(b) Per-lesion
All lesions Junior radiologist (n = 518) 51.5 (45.7–57.2) 82.1 (76.1–87.2) 52.1 (48.8–55.4) 81.77 (76.5–88.1) 63.5 (59.1–67.7) 157 161 35 148
Nuclear medicine (n = 427) 48.5 (42.8–54.3) 88.9 (81.0–94.3) 35.9 (33.0–39.0) 93.1 (88.4–96.0) 58.4 (53.4–63.3) 148 88 11 157
Senior radiologist (n = 454) 63.3 (57.6–68.7) 92.1 (86.0–96.2) 51.1 (47.2–55.0) 95.1 (91.3–97.2) 71.8 (67.3–76.0) 193 117 10 112

CI confidence interval, TP true positive, TN true negative, FP false positive, FN false negative