Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 17;15:157. doi: 10.1186/s13098-023-01133-7

Table 5.

Multivariate Cox regression analyses for MACE

MTES-IR Incident MACE,
n (%)
HR (95% CI)
Model1 Model2 Model3
Per 1 Unit increase 243 (22.1%) 1.05 (1.03–1.07) ** 1.04 (1.03–1.06) ** 1.05 (1.03–1.07) **
Per 1 SD increase 1.40 (1.24–1.60) ** 1.35 (1.19–1.53) ** 1.36 (1.20–1.55) **
Quartile 1 48 (17.4%) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference) 1 (Reference)
Quartile 2 51 (18.4%) 1.12 (0.75–1.66) 1.09 (0.73–1.62) 1.08 (0.72–1.60)
Quartile 3 62 (22.5%) 1.47 (1.00–2.14) * 1.34 (0.91–1.97) 1.34 (0.91–1.98)
Quartile 4 82 (30.3%) 2.19 (1.53–3.14) ** 1.94 (1.34–2.79) ** 1.97 (1.36–2.86) **
p for trend  < 0.001  < 0.001  < 0.001

Model 1: adjusted for age and gender

Model 2: adjusted for variables with p-value < 0.10, including age, hypertension, DM, previous stroke, LVEF, eGFR,   TC, LDL-C, beta-blockers

Model 3: adjusted for age, gender, previous MI, previous stroke, previous PCI, admission for MI, hypertension, DM, hyperlipidemia, FH-CAD, TC, LDL-C, eGFR, LVEF, antiplatelet drugs, beta-blockers, statins, ACEI/ARB and hypoglycemic drugs

MACE the major adverse cardiovascular events, METS-IR the metabolic score for insulin resistance, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, SD standard deviation

p values in bold are < 0.05

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.001