Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 14;13(7):e076716. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076716

Table 1.

Comparison of conventional D2C interventions with NYC D2S

Intervention feature Common D2C challenges NYC D2S solutions
Surveillance data source
  • Incompleteness

  • Reporting delays

  • Inaccuracies

  • Use highly complete and current NYC HIV surveillance registry, maintained in part via special investigations and quality-assurance checks and by pulling in data from multiple sources, including electronic laboratory reporting, partner services, perinatal surveillance, other disease surveillance registries, death registries and other jurisdictions’ HIV registries

Population
  • Limited to patients presumed out of care (but often found to be in care or otherwise ineligible for follow-up)

  • Attend to patients virally unsuppressed but in care (thus likely living within jurisdiction and represented with current laboratory reporting)

Outreach
  • Based on contact details that may be incomplete or outdated in surveillance data

  • Conducted by health department staff (unknown to the patient) or staff of clinics that failed to engage the patient previously

  • Outreach based on latest contact information from a programme currently serving the patient

  • Mobilise programme staff familiar to the patient and already working with them on patient-identified needs (eg, housing)

Patient support
  • Reconnection to HIV medical care settings, which may offer scant non-clinical/supportive services

  • Leverage programmes designed to address psychosocial and structural barriers to adherence, in part via supportive services and patient navigation strategies

Provider support
  • Notifications/alerts or reports (little if any additional support to providers or their agencies)

  • Supplement surveillance-based reports with agency capacity-building for next steps

  • Integrate reports and their use with Ryan White continuous QI processes

Primary outcome
  • Return to HIV care (usually one visit), which patients may otherwise do on their own

  • Focus on VS (VL<200 copies/mL on any test in 6-month follow-up period)

Study design
  • Often pre–post or other non-experimental designs

  • Use RCT to isolate intervention effects from usual-care outcomes

D2C, data to care; D2S, data to suppression; NYC, New York City; QI, quality improvement; RCT, randomised controlled trial; VL, viral load; VS, viral suppression.