Table 2.
Advantages and disadvantages of different elements for antibacterial CDT.
Metal element for antibacterial CDT | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|
Fe | Various sources, high catalytic activity, and low cost | Narrow optimal pH range (2–4) for the Fenton reaction |
Cu | A broader pH range for the Fenton-like reaction, high catalytic activity, and wound healing promotion capacity | Potential of heavy metal poisoning |
Mn | Manganese oxides have the advantages of simple preparation, low cost, and low biological toxicity; in addition, the existence of several valence states of Mn makes manganese oxide an excellent catalyst. | Possible requirement of HCO3− |
Co | High catalytic activity | Toxicity of excessive Co ions |
Ni | Good biocompatibility, prominent photothermal performance (for promoting CDT), and excellent biodegradability | Complexes containing Ni2+ have short triplet lifetimes and a weak ROS generation ability |
Ag | Inherent antibacterial effect | Requirement of increased H+ amount in the environment |
Ru | High catalytic activity and stability | High cost |