Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 30;29(4):215–222. doi: 10.4078/jrd.22.0005

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of enrolled patients at 1 year follow-up

Characteristics All patients with DAS28 <2.6 at first year follow up
(n=680)
Patients with DAS28 <2.6 and VAS-pain ≥4 (n=146) Patients with DAS28 <2.6 and VAS-pain <4
(n=534)
p-value
Age (yr) 53.6±12.9 55.4±13.5 53.7±12.8 0.059
Female 553 (81.3) 121 (82.9) 432 (80.9) 0.587
Marital status, married 602 (88.5) 126 (86.3) 476 (89.1) 0.340
Smoking history 0.986
Ex-smoker 63 (9.3) 13 (8.9) 50 (9.3)
Current smoker 42 (6.2) 9 (6.2) 33 (6.2)
Never 575 (84.5) 124 (84.9) 451 (84.5)
BMI (kg/m2)* 22.7 (20.5~24.9) 22.7 (20.3~25.0) 22.7 (20.7~24.9) 0.407
Disease duration (yr) 9.4±7.4 11.1±9.0 8.9±6.8 0.012
Tender joint count* 0.5±1.1 0.7±1.3 0.4±1.0 <0.001
Swollen joint count* 0.3±0.8 0.3±0.8 0.3±0.8 0.008
ESR (mm/h)* 6.0 (2.0~13.0) 4.0 (2.0~9.8) 7.0 (2.0~14.0) <0.001
CRP (mg/dL)* 0.1 (0.0~0.2) 0.1 (0.0~0.1) 0.1 (0.0~0.2) 0.372
Rheumatoid factor (positivity) (n=589) 467/589 (79.3) 93/120 (77.5) 374/469 (79.7) 0.588
Anti-CCP antibody (positivity) (n=443) 363/443 (81.9) 72/89 (80.9) 291/354 (82.2) 0.775
Physician’s GA* 2.0 (1.0~3.0) 3.0 (2.0~4.0) 2.0 (1.0~3.0) <0.001
Patient’s GA* 2.0 (1.0~3.0) 4.0 (3.0~5.0) 2.0 (1.0~3.0) <0.001
CDAI* 4.0 (3.0~7.0) 8.0 (6.0~10.0) 4.0 (2.0~6.0) <0.001
EQ-VAS (n=63)* 3.0 (2.0~4.0) 6.0 (5.8~7.0) 3.0 (2.0~3.0) <0.001
RAPID3* 5.3 (3.0~8.7) 12.0 (9.4~14.7) 4.3 (2.4~6.3) <0.001
Presence of hand erosions (n=352) 117/352 (33.2) 24/73 (32.9) 93/279 (33.3) 0.941
Presence of foot erosions (n=246) 88/246 (35.8) 28/53 (52.8) 60/193 (31.1) 0.003

Data are presented as number (%), mean±standard deviation, or median (interquartile range), unless otherwise indicated. DAS28: disease activity score of 28 joints, VAS: visual analog scale, BMI: body mass index, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein, CCP: cyclic citrullinated peptide, GA: global assessment, CDAI: clinical disease activity index, EQ-VAS: EuroQol visual analog scale, RAPID3: routine assessment of patient index data 3. Continuous data were assessed by independent t-test and categorical data were analyzed by chi-square test. *These data were assessed by Mann–Whitney U-test.