Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;51(4):921–934. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01948-y

Table 3.

Risk factors for eradication failure of tailored triple therapy (TTT) among treatment naïve patients (group A), N = 503

Factors, n (row percent %) N ER failed
n (%)
ER success
n (%)
p valuea ORcrudeb (95% CI) p valuec ORadjd (95% CI) p valuec
Gender 0.520
 Female 268 25 (9%) 243 (91%) Ref
 Male 235 26 (11%) 209 (89%) 1.21 (0.68–2.16) 0.520
Age (years), median (IQR) 503 13 (11–15) 13 (10–15) 0.871 1.03 (0.94–1.13) 0.546
Country of livinge 0.288
 Northern/Western Europe 146 11 (8%) 135 (92%) Ref
 Southern Europe 222 21 (9%) 201 (91%) 1.28 (0.60–2.75) 0.522
 Eastern Europe 113 16 (14%) 97 (86%) 2.02 (0.90–4.55) 0.088
 Israel and Turkey 22 3 (14%) 19 (86%) 1.94 (0.50–7.58) 0.342
Susceptibility sub-groupsf 0.053
 MET-S/CLA-S (treated with PAC or PAM) 302 23 (8%) 279 (92%) Ref Ref
 MET-S/CLA-R (treated with PAM) 109 15 (14%) 94 (86%) 1.94 (0.97–3.86) 0.061 1.90 (0.94–3.86) 0.074
 MET-R/CLA-S (treated with PAC) 81 13 (16%) 68 (84%) 2.32 (1.12–4.81) 0.024 2.69 (1.25–5.78) 0.011
 MET-R/CLA-R 11 0 11 (100%) N.A N.A
Antibiotic resistance 0.021
 Fully susceptibility to MET and CLA 302 23 (8%) 279 (92%) Ref Ref
 Single resistance to MET or CLA 190 28 (15%) 162 (85%) 2.10 (1.17–3.76) 0.013 2.20 (1.22–3.98) 0.009
 Double resistance to MET and CLA 11 0 11 (100%) N.A N.A
Tailored triple therapy 0.221
 PPI + AMO + MET (PAM) 218 18 (8%) 200 (92%) Ref Ref
 PPI + AMO + CLA (PAC) 285 33 (12%) 252 (88%) 1.46 (0.80–2.66) 0.223 1.59 (0.85–2.96) 0.146
PPI dose per dayg 0.650
 According to guidelines 2017 262 25 (10%) 237 (90%) Ref Ref
 Lower than recommended 232 25 (11%) 207 (89%) 1.15 (0.64–2.06) 0.650 1.31 (0.70–2.45) 0.397
Amoxicillin dose per dayg 0.500
 According to guidelines 2017 468 49 (10%) 419 (90%) Ref Ref
 Lower than recommended 26 1 (4%) 25 (96%) 0.34 (0.05–2.58) 0.298 0.32 (0.04–2.46) 0.273
Drug intake per day 0.220
 Three times per day 97 6 (6%) 91 (94%) Ref Ref
 Two times per day 370 38 (10%) 332 (90%) 1.74 (0.71–4.23) 0.225 1.59 (0.61–4.13) 0.339
Use of probiotics 0.940
 Yes 88 9 (10%) 79 (90%) Ref Ref
 No 381 40 (11%) 341 (89%) 1.03 (0.48–2.20) 0.941 1.19 (0.54–2.66) 0.665
Adverse events during therapy 0.634
 No 428 46 (11%) 382 (89%) Ref Ref
 Yes 52 4 (8%) 48 (92%) 0.69 (0.24–2.01) 0.498 0.81 (0.25–2.58) 0.716
Therapy compliance  < 0.0001
 ≥ 90% drug intakes 447 32 (7%) 415 (93%) Ref Ref
 < 90% drug intakes 30 11 (37%) 19 (63%) 7.51 (3.29–17.14)  < 0.0001 6.51 (2.79–15.19)  < 0.0001

Abbreviation: TTT tailored triple therapy, ER eradication rate, OR odd ratio, PPI proton pump inhibitor, AMO amoxicillin, CLA clarithromycin, MET metronidazole, PAC for treatment regimen with proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, PAM for treatment regimen with proton pump inhibitor, amoxicillin, metronidazole, N.A. not applicable, ref. reference category

aP values obtained by Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables, while Pearson’s Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables as appropriate. Bold p values indicate significant differences in the proportion of respective factors between the patient group with eradication failure and the patient group with eradication success by a p value ≤ 0.05

bCrude odd ratio (ORcrude) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) applied from a univariate logistic regression

cP values obtained from the Wald Chi-Square Test for the significance of the odd ratio (OR)

dAdjusted odds ratios (ORadj) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) obtained from the multivariable logistic regression adjusted with gender, age in years and country of living

eCountry distribution was given in supplementary file 2

fMET-S/CLA-S: Strains susceptible to both metronidazole and clarithromycin. MET-S/CLA-R: Strains susceptible to metronidazole but resistant to clarithromycin. MET-R/CLA-S: Strains resistant to metronidazole but susceptible to clarithromycin. MET-R/CLA-R: Strains resistant to both metronidazole and clarithromycin

gResults were evaluated by comparing the prescribed dose with the standard dosing regimen provided in the updated guidelines 2016 [8]