Table 2.
Comparison of calorimetry measures and VAS scores between 4 intervention meals.
| Calorimetry measures | 15% soy | 30% soy | 15% whey | 30% whey | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VO 2 (L/min) | |||||
| iAUC | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.10 ± 0.04 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Peak responseb | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| VCO 2 (L/min) | |||||
| iAUC | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.15 ± 0.04 | 0.13 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.18 |
| Peak response | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.21 |
|
| |||||
| RQ | |||||
| iAUC | 0.20 ± 0.12 | 0.21 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.11 | 0.18 ± 0.11 | 0.90 |
| Peak response | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 0.93 ± 0.05 | 0.91 ± 0.04 | 0.26 |
|
| |||||
| EE (kcal/min) | |||||
| iAUC | 2.60 ± 0.60 | 2.87 ± 0.77 | 2.50 ± 0.65 | 3.25 ± 0.51 | 0.06 |
| Peak responsea,b | 5.32 ± 0.36 | 5.51 ± 0.41 | 5.43 ± 0.46 | 5.57 ± 0.46 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| VAS scores | |||||
| Hunger | 4.42 ± 1.78 | 4.34 ± 1.83 | 4.66 ± 1.63 | 4.59 ± 1.40 | 0.89 |
| Thought of food | 4.23 ± 1.77 | 4.27 ± 1.74 | 4.55 ± 1.65 | 4.38 ± 1.41 | 0.76 |
| Urge to eat | 4.03 ± 1.28 | 4.29 ± 1.73 | 4.58 ± 1.56 | 4.39 ± 1.32 | 0.63 |
| Fullness | 3.87 ± 1.62 | 4.15 ± 1.68 | 3.90 ± 1.81 | 3.92 ± 1.62 | 0.95 |
Reported as mean ± SD; p values using RMANOVA. RQ, respiratory quotient; EE, energy expenditure; VAS, visual analogue scale. iAUC, incremental area under the curve. (a) 30% soy is significantly different from 15% soy and (b) 30% whey is significantly different from 15% whey.