Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 4;13:1181450. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1181450

Table 2.

Electron- and photon-EBRT dose recommendations and specifications indicated by the most common CIED manufacturers (17, 45).

Manufacturer Max PM dose Max ICD dose Max beam energy Casing material Lead Shielding of device Battery chemistry (8082) Comments based on PT studies
Biotronik (83) 2Gy 2Gy ≤10MV
No direct beam to device
Titanium Yes Li/MnO2
Li/SVO CFx
Biotronik devices particularly ICDs and CRTs have had the highest number of software malfunction during PT (41)
St. Jude Medical (84) No safe dose No safe dose Not specified
Do not use ionising radiation in the proximity of an implanted device
Titanium Not specified Li/SVO
Li/SVO CFx
Some PMs had software malfunctions (36, 39, 42)
Medtronic (85) 5Gy 1–5Gy
Depending on the model
≤10MV Titanium No (ineffective against neutrons Li/SVO
Li/SVO CFx
Software errors have occurred in these devices (37, 39, 42).
5 ICDs had significant loss of battery capacity (hardware malfunction) (41)
Boston Scientific (86) No safe dose limit
(Maximum total dose of 2Gy used
as a reference)
No safe dose limit
(Maximum total dose of 2Gy used
as a reference)
Not specified Titanium Yes
Consider all available shielding options
Li/MnO2
Li/SVO CFx
Only 1 PM reported which had a critical software malfunction (41)

PM, pacemaker; ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator; CRT, cardiac resynchronisation therapy device; PT, proton therapy; Li/MnO2, lithium-manganese oxide; Li/SVO, lithium-silver vanadium oxide; CFx, carbon monofluoride.