Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 17;12:125. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02277-3

Table 2.

Study quality and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials

Author, publication year Randomization process Deviations from the intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention) Deviations from the intended interventions (effect adhering to intervention) Missing outcome data Measurement of the outcome Selection of the reported result Overall
Daly et al. 2022 [60] Some concern Some concern low Low high Some concern high
Njike et al. 2021 [61] low Some concern low low low low Some concern
Keogh et al. (2020) [40] Some concern Some concern low low high Some concern High
Maki et al. (2020) [42] Some concern Some concern low Low high Some concern High
Shakoor et al. (2020) [48] Some concern Some concern low low high Some concern High
DiBella et al (2020) [35] Some concern Some concern low low high Some concern High
Aljohi et al. (2019) [32] Some concern Some concern low low high Some concern High
Fuller et al. (2018) [37] Some concern low low low high Some concern High
Missimer et al. (2017) [43] Some concern Some concern low low low Some concern Some concern
Dimarco et al. (2017) [36] Some concern Some concern low Low high Some concern Some concern
Fuller et al. (2016) [38] low low low low low low Low
Njike et al. (2016) [22] Some concern low low low high Some concern High
Clayton et al. (2015) [34] Some concern Some concern low low high low High
Katz et al. (2015) [23] Some concern low low low high low High
Ballesteros et al. (2015) [33] Some concern Some concern low low low Some concern Some concern
Burns-Whitmore et al. (2014) [51] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Rueda & Pramod Khosla (2013) [46] Some concern Some concern low low high Some concern High
Putadechakum et al. (2013) [45] Some concern Some concern Low low high Some concern High
Techakriengkrai et al. (2012) [52] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Pearce et al. (2011) [44] Some concern Some concern low Low high Some concern High
Vislocky et al. (2009) [49] Some concern Some concern Low low high Some concern High
Harman et al. (2008) [50] Some concern Some concern low low high Some concern High
Vander Wal et al. (2008) [58] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Katz et al. (2005) [39] Some concern Some concern low low low Some concern Some concern
Tannock et al. (2005) [53] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Chakrabarty et al. (2004) [54] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Chakrabarty et al. (2002) [55] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Schnohr et al. (1994) [56] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Edington et al. (1987) [57] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High
Sacks et al. (1984) [47] Some concern low low low low low Some concern
Flaim et al. (1981) [59] Some concern Some concern Low Low High Some concern High