Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023 Apr 3;12464:1246417. doi: 10.1117/12.2653647

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Quantitative evaluations of pipeline accuracy. (a) Mean percent difference between the “Distorted”, “Synthetic (Intermediate)”, and “SynBOLD (Final)” volumes used in our pipeline and the “Topup (State-of-the-art)” volume. Lower mean percent difference indicates increased similarity with the state-of-the-art. (b) Mutual information between the “Distorted”, “Topup (State-of-the-art)”, “Synthetic (Intermediate)”, and “SynBOLD (Final)” volumes and a corresponding N3 bias corrected T1w MRI. Higher mutual information indicates increased geometric similarity with the structural image. **** p < 0.0001 (Wilcoxon sign rank test with Bonferroni correction), ns = not significant.