Table 3.
Ref.
|
Study design/number of patients
|
Object of D-CEUS
|
Population/groups
|
Machine/UCA/Software
|
Significant results (P < 0.05)
|
Yang et al[47], 2023 | Retrospective/42 | pNET | Patients with histopathologically proved pNET/G1, G2, G3, pNEC | Acuson Sequoia, Acuson Oxana2/SonoVue/VueBox | rPE, rMTT and rAUC were higher in pNETs G1/G2 than G3/pNECs |
Zhang et al[45], 2020 | Prospective/11 | LAPC | Patient with LAPC underwent chemoradiotherapy | Acuson Oxana2/SonoVue/SonoLiver | MI decreased after chemoradiotherapy |
Vitali et al[43], 2015 | Prospective/20 | PC, focal AIP | Patients with diagnosis of AIP vs histologically proved PC | Acuson Sequoia 512, S200/SonoVue/VueBox | The difference in PE (dPE) between lesion and surrounding parenchyma in AIP was lower compared to dPE in PC |
D’Onofrio et al[40], 2014 | Prospective/10 | Suspected PDAC | Patients with suspected and then histologically proved PDAC | Acuson S2000/SonoVue/VueBox | PE and ascending curve values were different between lesion and adjacent parenchyma |
Kersting et al[42], 2009 | Prospective/60 | Undefined pancreatic lesion | Patients with undefined pancreatic lesion underwent biopsy/PDAC vs CP | Sonoline Elegra/SonoVue/Axius ACQ | TTP and AT were longer in PDAC compared to focal masses in CP |
AIP: Autoimmune pancreatitis; AT: Arrival time; CP: Chronic pancreatitis; D-CEUS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound; LAPC: Local advanced pancreatic cancer; MI: Maximum intensity; PC: Pancreatic cancer; PDAC: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; PE: Peak enhancement; pNET: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; pNEC: Pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma; rAUC: Relative area under the curve; rMTT: Relative mean transit time; rPE: Relative peak enhancement; TTP: Time to peak; UCA: Ultrasound contrast agent.