Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 23;10(7):1035–1047. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13748

TABLE 3.

Study characteristics and summary of findings of studies on treatment of punding in PD

Author, year Study design Groups Sample size mean age (SD or range) Sex, male Outcome measure methods Intervention Main findings
Fasano et al, 2011 28 Prospective open‐label study PD‐punders 10 61.1 ± 12.5 7 (70.0) Clinical evaluations (assessment of side‐effects, UPDRS‐III, and PRS‐II) Multistep algorithm for medical management of punding

‐Reduction of levodopa therapy was efficacious in 2 cases.

‐Amantadine was effective in controlling punding in 4 cases.

‐Quetiapine was mildly efficacious in 2 cases.

Ávila et al, 2011 29 Prospective cohort study PD patients with ICBs 25 74.0 ± 6.7 19 (76.0)

Structures clinical interview (included information on any intervention for ICBs)

Questionnaires UPDRS

HY

Increase or decrease of PD pharmacotherapy, use of psychotropic medication, psychosocial treatment.

‐Of the 11 patients with punding, these symptoms remained unchanged in 9 patients (81.82%) independently of changes in dopaminergic drugs.

‐Only 2 (18.18%) patients reported experiencing a full or partial remission of their punding symptoms over time; both had discontinued or decreased their doses of DA and had modified the psychiatric treatment.

Lhommée et al, 2012 30 Prospective cohort study PD patients 63 57.8 ± 7.2 40 (63.5)

Ardouin scale

MINI

MDRS

UPDRS III

STN DBS ‐1 patient diagnosed with punding at preoperative assessment showed clear improvement of the symptoms at 1‐year assessment after surgery.
Catalán et al, 2013 31 Prospective cohort study PD patients 8 67.9 ± 10.9 7 (87.5) Motor complications and behavioral disorders assessments JLI ‐ Of the 5 patients with punding, symptoms improved in all but disappeared completely in only 1.
Nardone et al, 2014 32 Randomized control trial PD‐Punders 4 65.8 (62–70) 3 (75.0)

PRS

OCI‐distress subscale scores

HAM‐A

HAM‐D

rTMS and sham stimulation LF‐rTMS produced a transient beneficial effect in PD patients with punding.
Healthy controls 8 65.2 (59–71) 7 (77.8)

Abbreviations: PD, Parkinson's disease; SD, standard deviation; UPDRS‐III, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score; PRS, Punding Rating Scale; ICB, impulse compulsive behavior; HY, Hoehn and Yahr scale; DA, dopamine agonists; MINI, Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview; MDRS, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale; STN, subthalamic nucleus; DBS, deep brain stimulation; JLI, jejunal levodopa infusion; PRS, Punding Rating Scale; OCI, Obsessive–Compulsive Inventory; HAM‐A, Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAM‐D, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; LF, low frequency.