Table 4.
Variables | ORs (95%CI) of UPF consumption (% of Kcal) | p-trend1 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | T3 | ||
Crude Model | 1 | 1.11 (0.60, 1.30) | 2.34 (1.97, 2.74) | <0.001 |
Model 1 | 1 | 1.15 (0.98, 1.36) | 2.83 (2.36, 3.35) | <0.001 |
Model 2 | 1 | 1.21 (1.00, 1.45) | 3.00 (2.46, 3.67) | <0.001 |
Model 3 | 1 | 1.13 (0.94, 1.36) | 2.64 (2.16, 3.22) | <0.001 |
Model 4 | 1 | 1.13 (0.51, 1.36) | 2.61 (2.14, 3.22) | <0.001 |
Model 5 | 1 | 1.13 (0.94, 1.36) | 2.64 (2.16, 3.22) | <0.001 |
p trend was determined by ANOVA and ANCOVA in the crude and adjusted models for continuous variables and mantel Hansel for categorical variables.
UPF: ultra processed food.
Model 1: adjusted for age (years), sex (male/ female), daily energy intake (Kcal/day).
Model 2: additionally, adjusted for smoking (yes/ no), level of education (under graduate/graduate/post graduate), different ethnicities and family history of cardiovascular disease (yes/no).
Model 3: additionally, adjusted for Mediterranean dietary index.
Model 4: additionally, adjusted for body mass index (Kg/m2).
Model 5: additionally, adjusted for waist circumference (cm).