Table 2.
Odds ratios and 95% CI of colorectal cancer according to the four major dietary patterns
| Dietary pattern | Tertiles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | T2 | T3 | |||
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Allergenic diet | |||||
| dModel 1 | 1.00 | 1.12 | 0.52, 2.41 | 2.34 | 1.12, 4.91 |
| eModel 2 | 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.27, 1.52 | 1.34 | 0.61, 3.14 |
| Plant-based diet | |||||
| dModel 1 | 1.00 | 1.60 | 0.83, 3.09 | 0.68 | 0.32, 1.46 |
| eModel 2 | 1.00 | 1.43 | 0.69, 2.97 | 0.45 | 0.19, 1.04 |
| Processed-diet | |||||
| dModel 1 | 1.00 | 1.43 | 0.68, 2.99 | 2.68 | 1.06, 6.77 |
| eModel 2 | 1.00 | 1.27 | 0.57, 2.84 | 3.45 | 1.25, 9.52 |
| Energy-dense diet | |||||
| dModel 1 | 1.00 | 0.68 | 0.33, 1.38 | 0.45 | 0.19, 1.05 |
| eModel 2 | 1.00 | 0.54 | 0.25, 1.15 | 0.53 | 0.21, 1.31 |
dAdjusted for age and total energy intake, eAdjusted for: age, total energy intake, gender, body mass index, marital status, education, and family history of CRC; significant associations are in bold