Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 19;18:48. doi: 10.1186/s13024-023-00638-z

Table 1.

Cohort characteristics

CT Cau (N=53) CT AA (N=52) p – valuea AD Cau (N=47) AD AA (N=51) p – valuea
Characteristics
 Sex 33 F, 20 M 33 F, 19 M - 29 F, 18 M 32 F, 19 M -
 Ageb 65 ± 8 64 ± 8 0.8848 68 ± 9 68 ± 9 0.9998
 MoCAc 26 ± 2 25 ± 3 0.7559 16 ± 6 14 ± 6 0.2055
*Aβ42d 1195.2 ± 262.0 1021.4 ± 301.1 0.0021 558.2 ± 169.9 483.4 ± 151.8 0.4026
 tTaud 186.2 ± 61.6 158.5 ± 56.5 0.6573 423.7 ± 189.2 301.5 ± 134.8 < 0.0001
 pTau181d 16.6 ± 5.6 14.1 ± 4.9 0.7787 43.3 ± 20.8 30.1 ± 14.1 < 0.0001
 tTau/Aβ42 d 0.14 ± 0.03 0.14 ± 0.03 0.9994 0.78 ± 0.31 0.66 ± 0.30 0.0850

Abbreviations: CT Control, AD Alzheimer’s disease, Cau Caucasian / White, AA African American / Black

ap-values were calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey correction, bold indicates p < 0.05

bAge in years. Values given as average ± standard deviation

cMost recent Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score. Values given as average ± standard deviation

dAβ42, tTau, pTau181, and tTau/Aβ42 in pg/mL. Values given as average ± standard deviation

*Aβ42 levels that reached saturation (1700 pg / mL) were excluded from calculations and analysis