Table 2.
Dependent variable: Apologetic behavior | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Independent variable | b | 95% Confidence interval | |z| | p | |
Gender | 0.011 | [−0.205, 0.226] | 0.10 | .923 | |
Relationship value | 0.082 | [0.033, 0.131] | 3.30 | 9.73 × 10−4 | *** |
Intimacy | 0.083 | [0.015, 0.151] | 2.40 | .017 | * |
Opponent responsibility | −0.144 | [−0.185,−0.102] | 6.78 | 1.21 × 10−11 | *** |
Dominance | −0.0111 | [−0.128, 0.106] | 0.19 | .849 | |
Prestige | 0.233 | [0.113, 0.353] | 3.80 | 1.42 × 10−4 | *** |
Dependent variable: Forgiveness | |||||
Independent variable | b | 95% Confidence interval | |t| | p | |
Gender | −0.097 | [−0.241, 0.047] | 1.32 | .189 | |
Relationship value | 0.100 | [0.069, 0.130] | 6.47 | 2.49 × 10−10 | *** |
Intimacy | 0.057 | [0.005, 0.109] | 2.15 | .032 | * |
Opponent responsibility | −0.103 | [−0.133,−0.073] | 6.68 | 6.63 × 10−11 | *** |
Dominance | −0.107 | [−0.185,−0.029] | 2.68 | .008 | ** |
Prestige | 0.191 | [0.112, 0.269] | 4.75 | 2.74 × 10−6 | *** |
Notes. Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was 1070.8 and 1157.9 for apologetic behavior regression and forgiveness regression, respectively.
*p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001.