Table 2.
Item1 | Quintile2 | SEM3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
Number of pens | 149 | 150 | 149 | 150 | 149 | — |
Diet NEm, Mcal/kg | 2.20 | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.19 | 2.20 | 0.015 |
Predicted NEm, Mcal/kg | 2.27a | 2.16b | 2.11c | 2.06d | 1.97e | 0.007 |
NEm residual | −0.159a | −0.046b | 0.004c | 0.057d | 0.145e | 0.0072 |
Diet NEg, Mcal/kg | 1.52 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 1.51 | 0.014 |
Predicted NEg, Mcal/kg | 1.58a | 1.48b | 1.44c | 1.39d | 1.32e | 0.006 |
NEg residual | −0.143a | −0.043b | 0.001c | 0.047d | 0.124e | 0.0063 |
Diet crude protein, % | 13.41 | 13.41 | 13.41 | 13.41 | 13.41 | 0.003 |
Diet ether extract, % | 4.78 | 4.78 | 4.78 | 4.78 | 4.78 | 0.000 |
Diet acid detergent fiber, % | 9.93 | 9.93 | 9.92 | 9.92 | 9.92 | 0.006 |
1Predicted NEm and NEg values were calculated from performance data using the methods of Zinn and Shen (1998).
2Quintles are based on NEm residuals (formulated NEm minus growth performance-predicted NEm), where Quintile 1 has the most negative differences and Quintile 5 has the most positive differences.
3Standard error of quintile means. The largest SEM value is reported.
a,b,c,d,eRow means that do not have the same superscript differ, P < 0.05.