Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288319

Yoga and Multiple Sclerosis: Maintaining engagement in physical activity

Jenni Naisby 1,*, Gemma Wilson-Menzfeld 2, Katherine Baker 1, Rosie Morris 1, Jonathan Robinson 3, Gill Barry 1
Editor: Bijen Filiz4
PMCID: PMC10355448  PMID: 37467234

Abstract

Background

Physical activity is encouraged for people with Multiple Sclerosis. Yoga is a popular form of physical activity and is chosen by some people with Multiple Sclerosis. However, little is known about the impact of yoga for this population, alongside what influences ongoing engagement.

Aim

The aim of this study is to qualitatively explore the impact of online home-based yoga on people with Multiple Sclerosis and to explore factors that influence engagement.

Methods

A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and focus groups with people with Multiple Sclerosis and a yoga teacher. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Ethical Approval was gained from Northumbria University.

Findings

Three overarching themes emerged from the analysis. ‘Yoga as engagement in physical activity’ captured the reasoning for participating in yoga and how this method of physical activity was an alternative to physical activity done prior to diagnosis. Frustration was apparent within this theme that some individuals were unable to engage in the range of physical activity that they wished to. ‘Yoga is a personalised approach’ demonstrated the flexibility and inclusivity of yoga, for individuals with varying symptoms to be able to engage with. Finally, ‘yoga impacts individuals both physically and psychologically’ captured the focus on the psychological impact of yoga, improving wellbeing and control.

Conclusions

Yoga gives people with Multiple Sclerosis the feeling of control over their symptoms and a means to engage with meaningful physical activity. Prior involvement in physical activity influenced engagement in yoga and wanting to push themselves. There was reluctance among this group to engage with aerobic activity, which warrants future investigation and support from health and exercise professionals.

Introduction

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, which is progressive in nature [1]. It is estimated that 2.8 million people worldwide live with MS [2]. The symptoms of MS can vary, affecting both physical and mental health [3] with symptoms including fatigue, movement problems [4], pain [5] reduced strength and balance [6] and reduced quality of life [7]. Whilst physical activity is encouraged for people with MS (pwMS), some have demonstrated fear and apprehension regarding engagement in physical activity, alongside concerns about fatigue [8].

PwMS who engaged with physical activity report improvement in strength, fatigue, quality of life, gait and balance [9]. The Chief Medical Officer Physical Activity Guidelines advocate a range of physical activity, including yoga, for individuals living with long term conditions [10]. Yoga has been shown to improve both physical and mental health [11]. Whilst some studies have demonstrated the positive effect of home yoga on strength and balance in MS [12], the evidence regarding the effectiveness of yoga and MS is scarce [13]. However, as yoga is increasing in popularity with this population [13] there is a need to explore the motivators and barriers to yoga in pwMS.

Views on engagement with yoga specifically have had limited exploration for pwMS [8]. It is advocated to address the individual needs of pwMS and to develop their knowledge of physical activity [8, 14]. There is no minimum amount of physical activity stated to achieve some health benefits, and for those with long term conditions, such as MS, engagement in small amounts of physical activity and building on this is encouraged [10]. It has been suggested home-based exercise is beneficial for pwMS, as it is safe and feasible alongside promoting access to exercise [15]. However, qualitative exploration of home-based yoga in MS is limited. The impact of yoga is complex, and personal experiences of the yoga process in neurological conditions including MS is required [16]. A hybrid approach to the delivery of yoga has demonstrated promise [17]. Understanding pwMS individual needs is of upmost importance in relation to engagement in physical activity [8, 14], in this case yoga. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore the impact of home-based yoga on pwMS and to understand engagement with this form of physical activity.

Methods

Study design

A qualitative, Phenomenological methodology [18] design was used to explore the role of yoga and engagement in this form of physical activity for pwMS. Ethical approval was received by Northumbria University’s ethical approval system (Ref: 29257).

Participants

Eight participants took part in this study (1 instructor; 7 class participants). All participants were over 18 years old, five were female and two were male. All class participants were members of a yoga studio based in London and were living with MS. All participants had taken part in face-to-face yoga prior to COVID-19 and then participated in this online at home. All participants had carried out yoga for at least two years. The instructor sent potential participants an information sheet and consent form via email, explaining the purpose of the study. Participants were offered the opportunity to ask questions before providing written consent.

Yoga class content

The yoga style is Iyengar Yoga. The teacher aims to include all with yoga and adapt as needed with props. Poses include arm stretches, supine leg extension, hamstring stretch supine. Standing poses include triangle pose, Trikonasana and Warrior poses with the help of a wall or table behind for balance and sometimes a chair in front with the backrest facing the student. These movements can be adapted to supine. Sitting poses include legs straight, bent, crossed and backwards Virasana. Inversions include shoulder stand with a chair, keeping the weight of the body on the chair or legs on the wall or bent on a chair.

Data collection

Participants were invited to attend either a focus group or semi-structured interview. The focus group included class participants only, and two separate one-to-one semi-structured interviews were setup for class participants who were not available at this time. The instructor also participated separately in a one-to-one interview. The focus group and all interviews were carried out using Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Interviews were conducted by GWM (Health Psychologist) and GB (Biomechanist).

A topic guide was informed by a review of the literature and covered motivations to begin yoga, the impact of yoga on MS symptoms, online yoga provision, in-person yoga provision, social connections, and future delivery (Fig 1). A paper reporting the role of online yoga provision from this interview schedule has been published elsewhere [17]. Sessions lasted between 27–53 minutes. The Zoom recordings were transcribed verbatim and deleted once the transcript was produced.

Fig 1. Focus group / semi-structured interview schedule.

Fig 1

Data analysis

Transcripts were uploaded into NVivo 12 (QSR International) for analysis. Braun and Clarke’s reflexive, inductive Thematic Analysis was chosen as the data analysis strategy due to its theoretical freedom [19, 20]. JN analysed all transcripts. Initially, the analyst immersed themselves within the transcripts before generating initial codes and subsequent themes. The potential influence of the researcher on this process, was addressed by frequent qualitative debriefing with the wider research team who have health and exercise backgrounds.

Results

Three themes were developed from the interviews and focus group (Table 1). Several sub-themes contributed to each theme.

Table 1. Development of overarching themes.

Yoga as engagement in physical activity An alternative form of physical activity
Previous engagement and frustration with physical activity
Yoga is a personalised approach (for a diverse condition) Understanding Multiple Sclerosis
Variation of the condition
Providing alternatives in yoga
Yoga impacts individuals both physically and psychologically Impact on mobility
‘Feel better’

1. Yoga as engagement in physical activity. Yoga allowed individuals to engage in physical activity in a manageable way. Some participants felt unable to participate in many forms of physical activity, which was both disheartening and frustrating. Discussion of previous physical activity, whilst providing some understanding and drive for participation yoga, could be distressing for some individuals due to the feeling of not being able to be involved any longer. Yoga was considered as providing some of the participants with a workout of strength and balance as well as offering some control and choice to participate in physical activity. Participants wanted a sense of working hard and achievement from taking part in yoga.

An alternative form of physical activity. Engagement in physical activity was important to individuals. Being able to access physical activity and feeling as though people had the capability to fully partake was necessary. Accessing different forms of physical activity could be challenging at times and yoga provided a means to participate. Two participants felt that yoga provided a comparable work out to their practices in the gym.

We go for a walk in the park, it’s a long way to get there and we don’t have a car. This business of having a live person, whos really good at saying come on, stick with it.

(P2)

But finding the yoga actually and I have found that some of the poses, they are just like working out in the gym.

(P3)

It is possible actually to get the results without being so tired and because of the weakness of my legs I am not able to do it, but there is a way and so good poses

(P3)

However, it was noted that yoga was not felt to support aerobic fitness. Individuals did discuss struggling to engage with this type of exercise. This was viewed as a limitation to peoples’ overall fitness, and some were unsure of how to participate in this type of physical activity.

So I consider myself to be really unfit, you know, so yoga does a lot of other things, but I am not sure how good it is for cardio.

(FGF1)

So I don’t think I will be able to do it, the cardio one

(P3)

Previous engagement and frustration with physical activity. Participation in physical activity in the past was difficult for some individuals to discuss due to them feeling unable to engage in activities they would enjoy such as the gym or cycling. The strength to do these activities and the fatigue following had influenced some participants decision to not partake in certain types of exercise. This drive to be involved with physical activity spurred some participants to put everything into their yoga class and feel as though they were getting the best out of this. The participants with a history of attending the gym, discussed this aspect in the most detail.

(discussing the gym) Really, and I love it. I love working out and now it just kills me so much I can’t do it.

(P3)

(discussing a bike) I used to do it, but I don’t have the strength…I get more frustrated because I see that I can’t do it…

(P3)

Depending on, I mean, you know, with MS particularly you can have a really good time, I don’t know about the other conditions, but you know you can have amazing energy and then you can wake up one morning and just have no energy at all. So the whole, for me doing anything like even going to a gym to get on a bicycle, you know, I am already factoring in the energy that it takes to get there. The energy it takes, because sometimes just putting your gym kit on takes a load of energy that one doesn’t have.

(FGF1)

One individual discussed in detail their previous physical activity and their understanding of the positive role of exercise and physical activity on the neurophysiology of MS. This contributed to their desire to frequently practice yoga.

Yeah, me as well, because for me it was important to work out, that’s how I’m used to and you know, my brother because he said, you have to keep moving he said, because you know the signal, even if it is lost all along the way because the nerves are damaged, it will look a way to and it will create new routes, but you need to you know exercise.

(P3)

2. Yoga is a personalised approach (for a diverse condition). Personalisation of yoga to individuals was key for successful engagement. This involved the teacher understanding the condition and being able to adapt poses and provide alternatives for individuals. Trust in the teacher and their ability was apparent within the interviews and the importance of this rapport that has been developed.

Variation of the condition. The variation of MS and how no two individuals experience the same symptoms was captured. Personalising the classes and ensuring an individualised approach was important to participants, as some of the poses and classes could require things that some people didn’t feel they were able to do. Alongside this, how symptoms changed and presented each day could vary which needs to be taken into account when engaging in a yoga class.

I’m not that mobile. Some of the people with MS they are more mobile and everyone here has a different, you know, difficulty, but for me it’s the left part, the left arm, which if they ask me to put my hand up, you see this one, to hold it straight is really kind of difficult and my posture as well. I have to be near a wall or something and when [anonymised] or some of the teachers are there

(P3)

Understanding of Multiple Sclerosis. The teacher and the class understanding MS was deemed of upmost importance to a number of individuals. It was important that a teacher understood the condition to personalise the yoga poses and session. Having someone who understood the nature of the condition, the variation and symptoms was also deemed key, as this would influence how much individuals felt they could be ‘pushed’.

So I do have to push them sometimes, but sometimes if they are really too tired, like they are sick or something, then obviously I am not going to push

(T1)

so working with someone who you, who helps you to understand the nature of your limitations or where you can improve and so on and so forth.

(FGF1)

but because I’m so slow, so it doesn’t really work, even [anonymised] told me, I can do it, but there will be more, faster and I will more frustrated with… I am actually, that is why when she is teaching she knows me. She says take your time, whatever, not only me but there are other people who are not that, as quick as, you know each other.

(P2)

She spends a bit of extra time with them. Really focusing on understanding their condition, what they can do. It’s like they get, during those first few classes, a lot of extra attention from her so she can work out, what they can do, what works for them, what’s best for them.

(FGM2)

but it is very useful I find to, regardless of whether it’s online or in the physical space, to be around people that sort of understand what you’re struggling with.

(FGF1)

you can really tell and [anonymised] advocates that as well, that you work to the individual’s need rather than the Iyengar set of rigid instructions

(FGF2)

Really focusing on understanding their condition, what they can do. It’s like they get, during those first few classes, a lot of extra attention from her so she can work out, what they can do, what works for them, what’s best for them.

(FGM2)

One individual spent some time discussing problems with remembering poses. Due to their previous engagement in yoga, they were able to work through the classes; however, highlighted this challenge individuals living with MS may face.

I’ve done yoga for a long time so I’m remembering what I was taught before my brain got demyelinated. I don’t have to learn it again as long as I am very careful, I stick with what I remember and make myself do what I know to do to stay safe.

(P2)

I’ve got to remember what he’s saying… I said I yearn for a routine I can follow and do the same again and again

(P2)

Providing alternatives in yoga. Yoga was viewed as being accessible through providing alternatives such as using a chair, equipment and adapting the postures. Yoga could be viewed as requiring as standardised sequence of postures; however, both the teacher and some participants commented on the flexibility and individualised nature of these sessions and the importance of this.

You know, she’s varying the poses for different people with different issues and that inspires confidence, the fact that you know she understands what is going on for you and she can talk you through different aspects of that and some do it slightly differently

(FGM2)

we do quite a lot of sitting things. You watched it… like arms stretches, twists where you can either sit on the floor or on the chair, wherever you are and then a resting pose, some sort of resting pose

(T1)

Unless you know one day they have a problem and then we’ll do an alternative. There are always alternatives. I mean, that’s the tiring thing, you don’t just say, you do this, we will all do it, everybody will do it a little bit differently, but as long as they do it and I’m, okay there is another point, we are very exact in Iyengar yoga. It doesn’t matter so much how they do it, whether it is a pillow or a bolster or this or that, as long as the shape is there and they get something from it.

(T1)

But I think, you know, [anonymised] specialises, you know, is especially interested in the individuals. So she aims everything that she does to compensate or to help whatever individual need a person has or [break in audio]. Everything is adaptable but I am not sure all, all teachers and even Iyengar teachers are that compassionate and have the experience that [anonymised] has in order to… Yeah, that and I see [anonymised] as well

(FGF2)

3. Yoga impacts individuals both physically and psychologically. Engagement in yoga and the impact on individuals psychologically was discussed in more depth and more frequently than the physical impact. Whilst there were noted physical benefits, there was less detail and focus centred around this area.

‘Feel better’. The impact of yoga on some individuals’ wellbeing was highlighted. Feeling better was a term frequently used to describe the effect of yoga and reasons for continued engagement. There was a sense of promoting yoga and wanting other individuals to be aware of the benefits participants described, in particular, this psychological impact.

You feel better than you’ve ever felt… It makes you feel better than anything, it’s amazing

(P2)

I just push myself and I go and after I feel really good, you know, mentally, physically

(P3)

And I have been able to do it before and with yoga when starting, I feel so good

(P3)

Yeah, as a… when you do yoga, you always feel better

(T1)

Alongside this, relaxation and breathing involved in yoga were viewed as an important element to some of the individuals. This was a technique individuals could practice at other times at home and was described as contributing to increased energy. Within the interview, the impact of fatigue and this limiting engagement in activities was highlighted, and yoga was a means to take some control of this symptom.

This business of relaxation is not be taken seriously

(P2)

But this one is for a Nyama breathing as well. It is a good one. So I can do it myself when I am, you know, at home.

(P3)

But definitely the breathing is very, very important and I will always finish them at least 15 minutes early and get them to do some breathing and because they need this at the end, because there is exhaustion, there is, yeah… they need that to recharge.

(T1)

I am full of energy after that.

(P3)

Impact on mobility. Regular yoga practice was discussed by some of the participants as helping with their mobility including walking, joint range of movement and spasticity. This was not something that was discussed at great length within the interviews or focus groups.

The yoga for MS is really good at stretching out those tendencies and why that helps someone with MS so much is because those are the muscles that if you stretch them your walking works better

(P2)

(discussing walking) I lifted my legs better and how to say, after doing 1½ hours some how your body, everything is just going

(P3)

Lie on your back and you use a belt and what it does is it pulls back hamstring, that stops you getting spasticity

(P2)

Discussion

This study aimed to explore the impact of home-based yoga in pwMS and to understand engagement with this form of physical activity. Whilst there is a focus on the role of yoga supporting improvements in strength and balance [12] and other physical symptoms, there was a limited discussion of these within the interviews. The key focus was the psychological benefits pwMS found with home-based online yoga. Key for successful engagement in physical activity for pwMS is self-efficacy [21]. A recent mixed methods study for yoga with pwMS found increased self-efficacy for physical activity, in turn increasing confidence in engagement with physical activity [22]. An improved sense of wellbeing prevailed within the interviews and having a sense of control over symptoms such as fatigue, which can be a barrier to engagement in physical activity [8, 23]. PwMS were able to engage with yoga with confidence, due to having this sense of control over symptoms and the ability to do this made individuals feel better and in turn continue their engagement. PwMS could use the techniques from the home-based yoga at times other than classes and found the relaxation element of yoga beneficial for wellbeing. Alongside this, an improved self-efficacy and control could be due to individualisation of the yoga, tailored to individuals’ symptoms. Yoga is inherently individualised, and instructors have demonstrated knowledge of conditions such as MS [24]. The real-world application of yoga as discussed in the interviews, should be considered for future large scale trails, and ensuring this individualised nature prevails [24]. Within the interviews the knowledge of the instructor and adapting postures was highlighted as key for supporting engagement. This is an important implication for future research, consideration of the individual.

In the context of control, the use of breathing exercises was discussed by some participants. Within yoga for traumatic brain injury these breathing exercises have been found to manage stress and support individuals emotionally [25]. Alongside this, within our current study breathing was mentioned in relation to fatigue management. A pilot trail of yoga including breathing exercises for pwMS found breathing exercises improve fatigue and to influence overall wellbeing [26]. It is postulated that combined exercises, including respiratory and the upper limb may influence fatigue due to the influence of MS on respiratory dysfunction, and breathing alongside upper limb exercise as a rehabilitation strategy may influence fatigue associated with this [27]. Yoga provides a means to intrgrate these and engage in both activities.

Engagement in some form of physical activity was important to the pwMS interviewed. Whilst yoga allowed this sense of participation and control, there was frustration evident about past physical activity. Lives before and after MS have been explored in a qualitative study with pwMS [28] finding uncontrollable changes in pwMS lives and a feeling of missing out on adulthood. The current study develops these findings by considering previous physical activity engagement, as there was certainly a frustration at being unable to engage with physical activity that individuals had done in the past. PwMS identity were that of a physically active person, and this was difficult to accept having to change the type of physical activity. Identity has been shown to be important for sustaining long term engagement with physical activity [29]. This is important to consider for supporting pwMS as it was apparent those interviewed had found their identity as engaging in yoga, however for others this may be more challenging and there is the need to understand individual preferences.

Due to previous engagement in physical activity, it was important to the pwMS that the yoga felt challenging and like a workout with this giving a sense of achievement and working hard. A randomised controlled trail of yoga versus physical therapy, which included a range of strength and conditioning exercises found no difference between these groups on the influence on quality of life [30]. However, self-belief is important for sustaining physical activity behaviours in the longer term, including confidence in ability to engage with physical activity [29]. Seeing progress and feeling a physical response to the yoga provided pwMS with satisfaction and encouragement that they were able to engage with home-based yoga to a level that suited their needs. There was some despondence in the group regarding aerobic exercise. Whilst yoga was felt to support strength, aerobic exercise was felt to be missing and a challenge to engage with for those interviewed. This highlights the need for support for pwMS to enhance confidence with this type of physical activity [31] alongside yoga, as aerobic activity is a key feature of physical activity guidelines for long term conditions [10] and specifically for MS [32]. Aerobic exercise in pwMS has been shown to improve physical, mental and social functioning [13]. However, this study has identified that some pwMS, who have a past history of physical activity, and are currently engaged with yoga, have concerns about aerobic exercise. Supervised aerobic exercise programmes have shown promise in pwMS [33]. Given the value of individualised approaches and support from the home-based yoga from this interview, these elements could be integrated into aerobic interventions, as some pwMS may require guidance and support in this area, irrespective of previous engagement.

The unpredictability of MS has been found to be a challenge for pwMS [34]. With physical activity and MS, barriers can mean this feels to be not possible [35]. However, awareness of symptom variation and individual needs can support tailoring of physical activity. Within the interviews, pwMS discussed the variation in the condition both between one another and themselves day to day. The individualised nature of yoga and the ability to adapt the postures allowed pwMS with a range of symptoms to participate. This finding has also been echoed in the context of relapse to support the feeling of accomplishment and making physical activity accessible for the individual being key for engagement [31]. This individualised approach worked well with the flexibility of home-based yoga, feeling understood and safe by the teacher and peers and that something was being achieved for the individual.

Strengths and limitations

To date, there is limited qualitative exploration of the impact and engagement in yoga for pwMS. This study has provided valuable insights into what pwMS value for this type of physical activity alongside engagement being influenced by the psychological benefits felt and perceived the need to engage with physical activity. The trustworthiness of the study is enhanced through the different perspectives of the research team from different backgrounds of health and exercise influencing the qualitative analysis. Thematic analysis allows a clear audit trail of the research enhancing credibility and dependability.

This study only included pwMS who were actively involved in a home-based yoga group. Therefore, views of those who have chosen to not continue or engage with this type of exercise are not considered. Future research should aim to explore this group to further develop understanding and development of yoga for pwMS. The time of this study was during the COVID-19 pandemic, so the context of this specific time should be considered. Alongside this, the views of pwMS were from one class, with one teacher. To enhance transferability a national exploration of yoga for MS should be considered.

Conclusions

Engagement in yoga by pwMS affords individuals some control over symptoms, including fatigue, which has been demonstrated to be a barrier to engagement in physical activity for pwMS. PwMS who were physically active prior to diagnosis want to engage with meaningful physical activity, which includes feeling a sense of working hard, which links with their previous engagement with physical activity. This is an important consideration for the design of future yoga interventions for pwMS. A number of pwMS wanted to feel challenged by the physical activity. Yoga allowed pwMS to tailor the exercise to their specific needs, alongside having flexibility to engage to allow for changes in symptoms.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Iyengar Yoga London.

Data Availability

Relevant excerpts could be made available upon request but only those that have been anonymised. The ethical approval process was dependent upon no raw data being shared outside of the research team and we have not received ethical approval to store excerpts in a data repository. This study was approved by Northumbria University’s ethical approval system. Data requests can be sent to dp.officer@northumbria.ac.uk.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.van der Linden M.L., Bulley C., Geneen L.J., Hooper J.E., Cowan P. and Mercer T.H., 2014. Pilates for people with multiple sclerosis who use a wheelchair: feasibility, efficacy and participant experiences. Disability and rehabilitation, 36(11), pp.932–939. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.824035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Walton C., King R., Rechtman L., Kaye W., Leray E., Marrie R.A., et al., 2020. Rising prevalence of multiple sclerosis worldwide: Insights from the Atlas of MS. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 26(14), pp.1816–1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bassi M., Grobberio M., Negri L., Cilia S., Minacapelli E., Niccolai C., et al., 2021. The contribution of illness beliefs, coping strategies, and social support to perceived physical health and fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 28(1), pp.149–160. doi: 10.1007/s10880-019-09692-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Crenshaw SJ, Royer TD, Richards JG, Hudson Dl. Gait variabilityin people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2006;12:613–19. doi: 10.1177/1352458505070609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Harrison A.M., Silber E., McCracken L.M. and Moss‐Morris R., 2015. Beyond a physical symptom: the importance of psychosocial factors in multiple sclerosis pain. European journal of neurology, 22(11), pp.1443–1452. doi: 10.1111/ene.12763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Latimer-Cheung A.E., Pilutti L.A., Hicks A.L., Ginis K.A.M., Fenuta A.M., MacKibbon K.A. et al., 2013. Effects of exercise training on fitness, mobility, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among adults with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review to inform guideline development. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 94(9), pp.1800–1828. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Strober LB. Quality of life and psychological well-being in the early stages of multiple sclerosis (MS): importance of adopting a biopsychosocial model. Disabil Health J 2018;11:555–6. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Learmonth Y.C. and Motl R.W., 2016. Physical activity and exercise training in multiple sclerosis: a review and content analysis of qualitative research identifying perceived determinants and consequences. Disability and rehabilitation, 38(13), pp.1227–1242. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1077397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Motl RW, Pilutti LA. The benefits of exercise training in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2012; 8(9): 487–497. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.UK Chief Medical Officer Physical Activity Guidelines [Online] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/832868/uk-chief-medical-officers-physical-activity-guidelines.pdf
  • 11.Suarez-Iglesias D., Santos L., Sanchez-Lastra M.A. and Ayan C., 2022. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the effects of yoga in people with Parkinson’s disease. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(21), pp.6210–6229. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1966522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hosseini S.S., Rajabi H., Sahraian M.A., Moradi M., Mehri K. and Abolhasani M., 2018. Effects of 8-week home-based yoga and resistance training on muscle strength, functional capacity and balance in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. Asian journal of sports medicine, 9(3). [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alphonsus K.B., Su Y. and D’Arcy C., 2019. The effect of exercise, yoga and physiotherapy on the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Complementary therapies in medicine, 43, pp.188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Momsen A.M.H., Ørtenblad L. and Maribo T., 2022. Effective rehabilitation interventions and participation among people with multiple sclerosis: an overview of reviews. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 65(1), p.101529. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ghahfarrokhi M.M., Banitalebi E., Negaresh R. and Motl R.W., 2021. Home-based exercise training in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review with implications for future research. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 55, p.103177. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2021.103177 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Legault Z., Znaty A., Smith S., & Boudrias M. H. (2021). Yoga Interventions Used for the Rehabilitation of Stroke, Parkinson’s Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of Clinical Research. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 27(12), 1023–1057. doi: 10.1089/acm.2021.0003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wilson-Menzfeld G., Naisby J., Baker K., Morris R., Robinson J. and Barry G., 2022. Yoga provision for individuals living with Multiple Sclerosis: Is the future online?. Plos one, 17(4), p.e0266786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266786 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Husserl E. The essential Husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology: Indiana University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. 2019;11(4):589–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Casey B., Coote S., Shirazipour C., Hannigan A., Motl R., Ginis K.M. et al., 2017. Modifiable psychosocial constructs associated with physical activity participation in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 98(7), pp.1453–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.01.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fasczewski K.S., Garner L.M., Clark L.A., Michels H.S. and Migliarese S.J., 2022. Medical Therapeutic Yoga for multiple sclerosis: examining self-efficacy for physical activity, motivation for physical activity, and quality of life outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation, 44(1), pp.106–113. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1760364 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kayes N.M., McPherson K.M., Taylor D., Schlüter P.J. and Kolt G.S., 2011. Facilitators and barriers to engagement in physical activity for people with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative investigation. Disability and rehabilitation, 33(8), pp.625–642. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.505992 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ross A., Touchton-Leonard K., Yang L., & Wallen G. (2016). A national survey of yoga instructors and their delivery of yoga therapy. International Journal of Yoga Therapy, 26(1), 83–91. doi: 10.17761/1531-2054-26.1.83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Donnelly K.Z., Goldberg S. and Fournier D., 2020. A qualitative study of LoveYourBrain Yoga: a group-based yoga with psychoeducation intervention to facilitate community integration for people with traumatic brain injury and their caregivers. Disability and Rehabilitation, 42(17), pp.2482–2491. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1563638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donnelly K.Z., Jeffreys C., MacKenzie T., McDonnell L., Black H., Bruce M.L. et al., 2022. A crossover pilot trial of the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of LoveYourBrain Yoga for community-dwelling adults with multiple sclerosis. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 49, p.101607. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101607 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Grubić Kezele T., Babić M., Kauzlarić-Živković T. and Gulić T., 2020. Combined upper limb and breathing exercise programme for pain management in ambulatory and non-ambulatory multiple sclerosis individuals: part II analyses from feasibility study. Neurological sciences, 41, pp.65–74. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-04046-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kassie S.A., Alia J. and Hyland L., 2021. Biopsychosocial implications of living with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study using interpretative phenomenological analysis. BMJ open, 11(8), p.e049041. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McEwan D., Rhodes R.E. and Beauchamp M.R., 2022. What happens when the party is over?: sustaining physical activity behaviors after intervention cessation. Behavioral Medicine, 48(1), pp.1–9. doi: 10.1080/08964289.2020.1750335 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lysogorskaia E., Ivanov T., Mendalieva A., Ulmasbaeva E., Youshko M., & Brylev L. (2023). Yoga vs Physical Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis: Results of Randomized Controlled Trial and the Training Protocol. Annals of Neurosciences, 09727531231161994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wilkinson H., McGraw C., Chung K. and Kyratsis Y., 2022. “Can I exercise? Would it help? Would it not?”: exploring the experiences of people with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis engaging with physical activity during a relapse: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation, pp.1–12. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2084774 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kalb R., Brown T.R., Coote S., Costello K., Dalgas U., Garmon E., et al., 2020. Exercise and lifestyle physical activity recommendations for people with multiple sclerosis throughout the disease course. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 26(12), pp.1459–1469. doi: 10.1177/1352458520915629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Langeskov‐Christensen M., Hvid L.G., Jensen H.B., Nielsen H.H., Petersen T., Stenager E. et al., 2022. Efficacy of high‐intensity aerobic exercise on common multiple sclerosis symptoms. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 145(2), pp.229–238. doi: 10.1111/ane.13540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wilkinson H.R. and Nair R.D., 2013. The psychological impact of the unpredictability of multiple sclerosis: a qualitative literature meta-synthesis. British journal of neuroscience nursing, 9(4), pp.172–178. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Plow M.A., Resnik L. and Allen S.M., 2009. Exploring physical activity behaviour of persons with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative pilot study. Disability and rehabilitation, 31(20), pp.1652–1665. doi: 10.1080/09638280902738375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Bijen Filiz

2 Feb 2023

PONE-D-22-34381Yoga and Multiple Sclerosis: Maintaining Engagement in Physical ActivityPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Renni Nasiby,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

           Reviewer 1:

<ul> <li>

I believe that this is an interesting study and it has a merit for this journal. However, this manuscripts needs substantial development and editing. Especially, a strong introduction, discussion and conclusion parts needed with up to date literature review and (2020 and above) and practical suggestions for the future researchers. A strong theoretical background needed in manuscript. In addition, reliability and validity of the data should be reported. In summary, the study needs more clarification in terms of theory, background and reliability and validity of the data. Also, each individual characteristics should be defined in detail such as gender, race, education and culture. 

Reviewer 2:

<li>

The original study on the effect of Yoga on Multiple Sclerosis is well conceptualized. The study aimed to explore the impact of online home-based yoga on people with Multiple Sclorasis qualitatively.

I recommend the authors to give more details on the protocol and Yoga sessions conducted. The frequency, the yoga poses adapted or not adapted to the needs of the participants.

Since, YOGA can be individualized as movement intervention, I would like to see the how the increased awareness and knowledge on MS could contribute to the further individualization to YOGA sessions.

It is possible to discuss the role of the breathing exercises more on the positive feelings and wellbeing. Moreover, if the combination of Yoga poses and breathing augmented the effect, it would be good to have some science based ideas about this link.

Please describe if there is any specific information on the degree or level of participant's MS even the average age.

The words "sense of working hard" and "sense of achievement" could be mentioned in the results and discussion to strengthen the link between the conclusion and the results.

Data is available due to the condition for the ethical approval.

Please submit your revised manuscript by 28 February 2023. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Bijen Filiz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified (1) whether consent was informed and (2) what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

If you are reporting a retrospective study of medical records or archived samples, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data from their medical records used in research, please include this information.

3. In your Data Availability statement, you have not specified where the minimal data set underlying the results described in your manuscript can be found. PLOS defines a study's minimal data set as the underlying data used to reach the conclusions drawn in the manuscript and any additional data required to replicate the reported study findings in their entirety. All PLOS journals require that the minimal data set be made fully available. For more information about our data policy, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability.

Upon re-submitting your revised manuscript, please upload your study’s minimal underlying data set as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and include the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers within your revised cover letter. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. Any potentially identifying patient information must be fully anonymized.

Important: If there are ethical or legal restrictions to sharing your data publicly, please explain these restrictions in detail. Please see our guidelines for more information on what we consider unacceptable restrictions to publicly sharing data: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. Note that it is not acceptable for the authors to be the sole named individuals responsible for ensuring data access.

We will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide in your cover letter.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The original study on the effect of Yoga on Multiple Sclerosis is well conceptualized. The study aimed to explore the impact of online home-based yoga on people with Multiple Sclorasis qualitatively.

I recommend the authors to give more details on the protocol and Yoga sessions conducted. The frequency, the yoga poses adapted or not adapted to the needs of the participants.

Since, YOGA can be individualized as movement intervention, I would like to see the how the increased awareness and knowledge on MS could contribute to the further individualization to YOGA sessions.

It is possible to discuss the role of the breathing exercises more on the positive feelings and wellbeing. Moreover, if the combination of Yoga poses and breathing augmented the effect, it would be good to have some science based ideas about this link.

Please describe if there is any specific information on the degree or level of participant's MS even the average age.

The words "sense of working hard" and "sense of achievement" could be mentioned in the results and discussion to strengthen the link between the conclusion and the results.

Data is available due to the condition for the ethical approval.

Reviewer #2: I believe that this is an interesting study and it has a merit for this journal. However, this manuscripts needs substantial development and editing. Especially, a strong introduction, discussion and conclusion parts needed with up to date literature review and (2020 and above) and practical suggestions for the future researchers. A strong theoretical background needed in manuscript. In addition, reliability and validity of the data should be reported. In summary, the study needs more clarification in terms of theory, background and reliability and validity of the data. Also, each individual characteristics should be defined in detail such as gender, race, education and culture. Best Regards.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Ertan TUFEKCIOGLU

Reviewer #2: Yes: Ferman Konukman

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288319.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


29 Apr 2023

Dear reviewers,

Very many thanks for your helpful comments on the manuscript. We have addressed all areas and feel this is a much-improved paper. The responses to each reviewer point are in the table below.

Information about informed consent has been added to lines 129-133. The data availability statement is located on lines 548-552.

The response to reviewers has been uploaded as a word document including a table with each comment and response.

Kind regards

Dr Jenni Naisby

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers Comments.docx

Decision Letter 1

Bijen Filiz

26 Jun 2023

Yoga ve Multipl Skleroz: Fiziksel Aktiviteye Bağlılığı Sürdürme

PONE-D-22-34381R1

Sevgili Doktor Jenni Naisby,

Makalenizin bilimsel olarak yayına uygun olduğuna karar verildiğini ve tüm üstün teknik gereklilikleri karşıladığında yayın için resmi olarak kabul edileceğini size bildirmekten memnuniyet duyuyoruz.

Bir hafta içinde gerekli değişiklikleri içeren bir e-posta alacaksınız. Bunlar ele alındığında, resmi bir kabul mektubu alacaksınız ve makalenizin yayınlanması planlanacak.

Resmi kabulden kısa bir süre sonra bir ödeme faturası gelir. Verimli bir süreç sağlamak için, lütfen http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ adresinden Yayın Yöneticisi'nde oturum açın, sayfanın üst kısmındaki 'Bilgilerimi Güncelle' bağlantısını tıklayın ve kullanıcı bilgilerinizin güncel olup olmadığını iki kez kontrol edin. bugüne kadar. Faturalandırmayla ilgili herhangi bir sorunuz varsa, lütfen doğrudan Authorbilling@plos.org adresinden Yazar Faturalandırma departmanımızla iletişime geçin.

Kurumunuzun veya kuruluşlarınızın bir basın ofisi varsa, etkisini en üst düzeye çıkarmak için lütfen yaklaşan makaleniz hakkında onları bilgilendirin. Basın materyallerini hazırlayacaklarsa, lütfen resmi kabulü aldıktan sonra en geç 48 saat içinde basın ekibimizi bilgilendirin. Makaleniz, yayın tarihinde Doğu Saati ile 14:00'e kadar katı basın ambargosu altında kalacaktır. Daha fazla bilgi için lütfen onepress@plos.org ile iletişime geçin.

Saygılarımla,

Bijen Filiz

Akademik Editör

PLOS ONE

Ek Editör Yorumları (isteğe bağlı):

Hakemlerin yorumları:

Hakemlerin Sorulara Yanıtları

Yazara Yorumlar

1. Yazarlar, önceki bir gözden geçirme turunda dile getirdiğiniz yorumlarınıza yeterince değindiyse ve bu makalenin artık yayın için kabul edilebilir olduğunu düşünüyorsanız, burada "Yazarın Yorumları" bölümünü atlamak için şunu belirtebilirsiniz: "Editöre Gizli" bölümündeki çıkar çatışması bildiriminizi ve "Kabul Et" önerinizi gönderin.

1 Numaralı İnceleyen: Tüm yorumlar ele alındı

2. İnceleyen: Tüm yorumlar ele alındı

**********

2. El yazması teknik olarak sağlam mı ve veriler sonuçları destekliyor mu?

El yazması, teknik olarak sağlam bir bilimsel araştırma parçasını, sonuçları destekleyen verilerle açıklamalıdır. Deneyler, uygun kontroller, çoğaltma ve numune boyutları ile titizlikle yürütülmüş olmalıdır. Sonuçlar, sunulan verilere dayanarak uygun şekilde çıkarılmalıdır.

1. İnceleyen: Evet

2. İnceleyen: Evet

**********

3. İstatistiksel analiz uygun ve titiz bir şekilde yapıldı mı?

1. İnceleyen: Evet

2. İnceleyen: Yok

**********

4. Yazarlar, makalelerindeki bulguların altında yatan tüm verileri eksiksiz olarak sağladı mı?

PLOS Veri politikası, yazarların makalelerinde açıklanan bulguların altında yatan tüm verileri, nadir istisnalar dışında, kısıtlama olmaksızın tamamen erişilebilir hale getirmelerini gerektirir (lütfen el yazması PDF dosyasındaki Veri Kullanılabilirlik Bildirimine bakın). Veriler, makalenin veya destekleyici bilgilerinin bir parçası olarak sağlanmalı veya halka açık bir depoda saklanmalıdır. Örneğin, özet istatistiklere ek olarak, ortalamaların, medyanların ve varyans ölçümlerinin arkasındaki veri noktaları da mevcut olmalıdır. Verilerin herkese açık olarak paylaşılmasına ilişkin kısıtlamalar varsa - örneğin, katılımcı gizliliği veya üçüncü şahıslardan alınan verilerin kullanımı - bunlar belirtilmelidir.

1. İnceleyen: Hayır

2. İnceleyen: Evet

**********

5. Makale anlaşılır bir şekilde sunuldu ve standart İngilizce ile yazılmış mı?

PLOS ONE kabul edilen makaleleri kopyalayıp düzenlemez, bu nedenle gönderilen makalelerdeki dil açık, doğru ve net olmalıdır. Herhangi bir tipografik veya gramer hatası revizyonda düzeltilmelidir, bu nedenle lütfen belirli hataları burada not edin.

1. İnceleyen: Evet

2. İnceleyen: Evet

**********

6. Yazarın Yorumlarını Gözden Geçirin

Lütfen yukarıdaki sorulara verdiğiniz cevapları açıklamak için verilen alanı kullanınız. Yazar için ikili yayın, araştırma etiği veya yayın etiği ile ilgili endişeler dahil olmak üzere ek yorumlar da ekleyebilirsiniz. (Lütfen yorumunuzu 20.000 karakteri aşarsa ek olarak yükleyin)

1 Numaralı İnceleyici: İncelemeci yorumlarının çoğuna değindiğiniz için teşekkür ederiz. Bir alandaki ilk çalışmalardan biri olmanın sınırlamaları olduğunu anlıyorum. Ancak, çalışma sınırları kabul edilebilir.

Yazarları bu yüksek kaliteli çalışma için tebrik etmek istiyorum.

Saygılarımızla

2. Hakem: Bu ilginç çalışma için yazarlara teşekkür etmek istiyorum. Bu yazının mevcut durumunun yayın için kabul edilebilir olduğuna inanıyorum. Saygılarımla.

**********

7. PLOS yazarları, makalelerinin akran değerlendirmesi geçmişini yayınlama seçeneğine sahiptir ( bu ne anlama geliyor? ). Yayınlanırsa, bu, tam akran değerlendirmenizi ve ekli dosyaları içerecektir.

"Hayır"ı seçerseniz, kimliğiniz anonim kalır ancak incelemeniz yine de herkese açık olabilir.

Bu akran değerlendirmesi için kimliğinizin herkese açık olmasını istiyor musunuz? Rızanın geri alınması da dahil olmak üzere bu seçim hakkında bilgi için lütfen Gizlilik Politikamıza bakın .

Yorumcu #1:  Evet:  Ertan Tüfekçioğlu

Yorumcu #2:  Evet:  Ferman Konukman

**********

Acceptance letter

Bijen Filiz

11 Jul 2023

PONE-D-22-34381R1

Yoga and Multiple Sclerosis: Maintaining Engagement in Physical Activity

Dear Dr. Naisby:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Bijen Filiz

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers Comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    Relevant excerpts could be made available upon request but only those that have been anonymised. The ethical approval process was dependent upon no raw data being shared outside of the research team and we have not received ethical approval to store excerpts in a data repository. This study was approved by Northumbria University’s ethical approval system. Data requests can be sent to dp.officer@northumbria.ac.uk.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES