Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 18;10(2-3):120–127. doi: 10.1007/s12672-019-00363-4

Table 1.

Clinical and biochemical features of the study patients (column “ALL”) and comparison between women in premenopausal status (PRE) and postmenopausal status (POST) at the time of CBG withdrawal

Group ALL PRE POST p value (PRE vs. POST)
Age at diagnosis, median (range) (years) 29 (15–53) 28 (15–43) 43 (24–53) < 0.001
Maximum diameter, mean ± SD (mm) 5.7 ± 1.6 5.6 ± 1.6 6.3 ± 1.7 ns
PRL at diagnosis, median (range) (mIU/L) 2056 (933–4537) 2014 (933–4537) 2120 (1102–4070) ns
Other dopamine agonists prior to CBG (n) 21/62a 16/48 5/14 ns
Treatment duration, median (range) (years) 3 (1–25) 3 (1–11) 5 (2–25) 0.001
CBG dose per week, median (range) (mg) 0.5 (0.25–1.5) 0.5 (0.25–1.5) 0.5 (0.25–1) ns
Cumulative CBG dose, median (range) (mg) 78 (13–1300) 52 (13–390) 130 (52–1300) 0.007
Age at withdrawal, median (range) (years) 34 (20–56) 31 (20–49) 51 (46–56) < 0.001
PRL before withdrawal, median (range) (mIU/L) 161 (21–464) 148 (21–464) 165 (42–403) ns
Prolactinoma disappearance before withdrawal (n) 19/62 14/48 5/14 ns

aSixteen treated with bromocriptine, 1 with lysuride, 2 with dihydroergocryptine, 1 with quinagolide, and 1 with dihydroergocryptine followed by bromocriptine

PRL, prolactin levels; CBG, cabergoline