Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 20;38(Suppl 3):878–886. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08114-6

Table 4.

Difference-in-Differences Results for Provider Productivity in Cardiology and Orthopedics

Intervention Comparison Unadjusted DID* Adjusted DID
Pre-post change P-value Pre-post change P-value Estimate (95% CI) P-value Estimate (95% CI) P-value
Cardiology Visits per FTE  − 17.17  < 0.001  − 32.43  < 0.001 15.22 (10.51, 19.93)  < 0.001 8.48 (3.13, 13.81) 0.002
RVUs per FTE  − 20.61  < 0.001  − 53.27  < 0.001 32.75 (25.45, 40.05)  < 0.001 25.17 (17.05, 33.29)  < 0.001
Patients per day per provider  − 1.26  < 0.001  − 1.31  < 0.001 0.04 (− 0.24, 0.32) 0.771  − 0.22 (− 0.56, 0.13) 0.215
Orthopedics Visits per FTE  − 4.33 0.133  − 20.33  < 0.001 15.76 (9.61, 21.91)  < 0.001 12.50 (5.17, 19.83) 0.001
RVUs per FTE  − 1.51 0.671  − 21.67  < 0.001 19.89 (11.86, 27.92)  < 0.001 17.26 (7.43, 27.10) 0.001
Patients per day per provider  − 0.67  < 0.001  − 0.66  < 0.001 0.001 (− 0.25, 0.25) 0.993 0.01 (− 0.26, 0.28) 0.937

RVUs relative value units, DID difference-in-differences

*Clinic and pay period fixed effects only

Adjusted for proportion of veterans over age 65, proportion of veterans between ages 35 and 65, proportion of enrollees with priority status 7 or 8, Zillow Home Value Index, Medicare Advantage penetration, NOSOS risk score, proportion of Black enrollees, proportion of American Indian enrollees, proportion of Asian enrollees, and proportion of Native Hawaiian enrollees plus clinic and pay period fixed effects