Table 3.
McNemar’s tests comparing differences in the number of participants classified as impaired.
| Number classified as impaired |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index | Group | n | Age, education, and sex corrected | Age-only corrected | Change | p |
|
| ||||||
| Attention | MA-ACT | 38 | 5 | 6 | +1 | 1.00 |
| MA-REM | 49 | 11 | 17 | +6 | .031* | |
| POLY-ACT | 16 | 4 | 3 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-REM | 49 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| Control | 61 | 10 | 11 | +1 | 1.00 | |
| Language | MA-ACT | 38 | 5 | 6 | +1 | .250 |
| MA-REM | 49 | 7 | 9 | +2 | .625 | |
| POLY-ACT | 16 | 6 | 5 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-REM | 49 | 9 | 11 | +2 | .500 | |
| Control | 61 | 8 | 7 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| Memory | MA-ACT | 38 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 1.00 |
| MA-REM | 49 | 19 | 27 | +8 | .021* | |
| POLY-ACT | 16 | 7 | 8 | +1 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-REM | 49 | 25 | 28 | +3 | .375 | |
| Control | 61 | 8 | 6 | −2 | .500 | |
| Spatial | MA-ACT | 38 | 3 | 4 | +1 | 1.00 |
| MA-REM | 49 | 5 | 4 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-ACT | 16 | 6 | 7 | +1 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-REM | 49 | 7 | 6 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| Control | 61 | 8 | 6 | −2 | .500 | |
| Executive Functions | MA-ACT | 38 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 1.00 |
| MA-REM | 49 | 5 | 4 | −1 | .250 | |
| POLY-ACT | 16 | 3 | 4 | +1 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-REM | 49 | 9 | 8 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| Control | 61 | 2 | 1 | −1 | 1.00 | |
| Total Score | MA-ACT | 38 | 4 | 5 | +1 | 1.00 |
| MA-REM | 49 | 7 | 13 | +6 | .031* | |
| POLY-ACT | 16 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 1.00 | |
| POLY-REM | 49 | 13 | 15 | +2 | .687 | |
| Control | 61 | 6 | 5 | −1 | 1.00 | |
Note. Asterisks denote significant difference based on McNemar’s tests. A p-value of .05 was used as the level of significance for all analyses. Change column identifies loss or gain in number of participants classified as impaired using the age-only corrected norms from the age, education, and sex corrected norms.