Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023;34(1):35–57. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2023.0004

Table 4.

RESULTS OF HIERARCHICAL REGRESSION ANALYSES FOR SYMPTOMS OF DEPRESSION AND POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDERa

Model 1—Social Support (Full Scale) Model 2—Social Support from Friends
Independent Variables Depressive Symptoms PTSD Symptoms Depressive Symptoms PTSD Symptoms
Sample Full Sample Non- Abused Abused Full Sample Non- Abused Abused Full Sample Non- abused Abused Full Sample Non- abused Abused
Step 1: Demographics
 Age −.06 0 −.13 −.1 −.05 −.14 −.06 0 −.14 −.1 −.06 −.15
 Sexual Identity .06 .06 .03 −.01 .03 −.1 .06 .06 .04 −.02 .04 −.12
 Abuse Status .26*** .33*** .26*** .33***
R2 .14 0 .05 .2 .01 .05 .14 0 .05 .2 .01 .05
F 12.66*** .09 2.45 19.50*** .52 2.47 12.66*** .09 2.45 19.50*** .52 2.47
Step 2: Main Predictor
 Discrimination .33*** .22* .50*** 37*** .28** .58*** .33*** .24** .51*** 37*** .28** .59***
R2 .24 .06 .21 .33 .09 .3 .24 .06 .21 .33 .09 .3
ΔR2 .1 .06 .16 .13 .08 .25 .1 .06 .16 .13 .08 .25
ΔF 29.41*** 8.76** 19.03*** 42.72*** 12.33** 33.69*** 29.41*** 8.76** 19.03*** 42.72*** 12.33** 33.69***
Step 3: Protective Factors
Social Support (full scale) −.08 −.14 −.01 −.14* −.04 −.28**
Social support (subscales)
 Friends −.09 −.16 −.02 −.15** −.1 −.24**
  R2 .24 .08 .21 .35 .09 .39 .25 .09 .21 .35 .1 .36
  ΔR2 .01 .02 0 .02 0 .09 .01 .03 0 .02 .01 .06
  ΔF 1.74 2.54 .28 6.97** .22 13.56*** 2.35 3.72 .27 7.51** 1.32 9.20**
Step 4: Moderator
Social support (subscales)
 Discrimination * Friends .22*
  R2 .25
  ΔR2 .04
  ΔF 4.63*
Model 3—Social Support from Family Model 4—Social Support from Significant Other
Independent Variables Depressive Symptoms PTSD Symptoms Depressive Symptoms PTSD Symptoms
Sample Full Sample Non− Abused Abused Full Sample Non− Abused Abused Full Sample Nonabused Abused Full Sample Nonabused Abused
Step 1: Demographic Variables
 Age −.06 .01 −.12 −.1 −.05 −.14 −.06 .01 −.13 −.1 −.05 −.14
 Sexual Identity .07 .06 .04 0 .03 −.08 .06 .05 .03 −.01 .02 −.09
 Abuse Status .26*** .34*** 29*** .35***
R2 .14 0 .05 .2 .01 .05 .14 0 .05 .2 .01 .05
F 12.66*** .09 2.45 19.50*** .52 2.47 12.66*** .09 2.45 19.50*** .52 2.47
Step 2: Main Predictor
 Discrimination .31*** .21* .44*** .36*** .29** .55*** .33*** .24** .48*** .38*** .29** .62***
R2 .24 .06 .21 .33 .09 .3 .24 .06 .21 .33 .09 .3
ΔR2 .1 .06 .16 .13 .08 .25 .1 .06 .16 .13 .08 .25
ΔF 29.41*** 8.76** 19.03*** 42.72*** 12.33** 33.69*** 29.41*** 8.76** 19.03*** 42.72*** 12.33** 33.69***
Step 3: Protective Factors
Social support (subscales)
  Family −.12 −.15 −.12 −.15** −.03 −.35***
  Significant Other .02 −.03 .07 −.06 .01 −.15
R2 .25 .08 .22 .35 .09 .42 .24 .06 .21 .33 .09 .33
ΔR2 .01 .02 .01 .02 0 .12 0 0 0 0 0 .03
ΔF 3.8 2.76 1.68 7.64** .04 19.71*** .05 .15 .25 1.45 .02 3.79

Notes

a

Full sample N=236; Non- abused participants N=138; Abused participants only N=98; All standardized regression coefficients are from the final step in the analyses.

*

p< .05

**

p< .01

***

p< .001(2-tailed)