Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;130(4):633–640. doi: 10.1017/S0007114522003567

Table 2.

Effect of being randomised to vitamin D supplementation on PIQ-6 score, presence of some or more pain impact and presence of some bodily pain

PIQ-6 score, mean sd Some or more pain impact*, n % Some bodily pain, n %
Year 1
  Vitamin D (n 9733) 50·4 9·8 5008 51·5 4836 48·2
  Placebo (n 9658) 50·4 9·7 4907 50·8 4751 47·6
  Effect estimate (95 % CI), 0·04 −0·23, 0·31 1·01 0·99, 1·04 1·01 0·98, 1·04
Year 2
  Vitamin D (n 7630) 50·3 9·8 3893 51·0 3926 49·5
  Placebo (n 7550) 50·4 9·9 3878 51·4 3864 49·1
  Effect estimate (95 % CI), −0·17 −0·48, 0·14 0·99 0·96, 1·02 1·01 0·98, 1·04
Year 5
  Vitamin D (n 9164) 49·9 8·9 3982 43·5 4255 46·2
Placebo (n 9029) 49·8 8·7 3840 42·5 4131 45·5
  Effect estimate (95 % CI), 0·08 −0·17, 0·34 1·02 0·99, 1·06 1·01 0·98, 1·05
Overall effect estimate (95 % CI)§ 0·02 −0·20, 0·25 1·01 0·99, 1·03 1·01 0·99, 1·03

PIQ, Pain Impact Questionnaire.

*

Some or more pain impact: PIQ-6 score >50.

Effect estimates comparing vitamin D with placebo (reference).

Effect estimates adjusted for age, sex and state.

§

Effect estimate calculated using all available records; generalised estimating equations with exchangeable correlation matrix used to account for intra-person correlation.

Adjusted mean difference (95 % CI) estimated using linear regression.

Adjusted prevalence ratio (95 % CI) calculated using log-linked binomial regression.