Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 11;2(6):354–362. doi: 10.1007/s12672-011-0091-5

Table 1.

Summary of studies evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET in the detection of malignant adrenal lesions and including cases of ACC

  Patients (n) Verification (n), biopsy/histology Malignant (n) ACC (n) Method Sensitivity Specificity
Maurea et al., 2001 [53] 26 26 13 6 Visuala 100% 100%
Zettinig et al., 2004 [82] 16 15 3 1 Visuala 100% 100%
Tenenbaum et al., 2004 [65] 13 13 4 3 Visuala 100% 100%
Metser et al., 2006 [54] 150 6 68 2 SUVmax (3.1) 98.5% 92%
Han et al., 2007 [35] 105 22 64 3 SUVmax NA NA
Caoili et al., 2007 [18] 59 4 12 1 SUVmax and SUR NA NA
Tessonier et al., 2008 [67] 37 29 12 3 Visuala 100% 86%
SUVmax (3.28) 91.7% 71.4%
SUR (1.8) 100% 100%
Groussin et al., 2009 [32] 65 65 22 22 SUVmax (3.4) 100% 70%
SUR (1.45) 100% 88%
Ansquer et al., 2010 [3] 78 72 27 10 Visuala 89% 76%
SUVmax (3.3) 93% 78%

NA not available, SUR tumor/liver SUVmax ratio

aConsidering malignancy in case FDG uptake higher than blood pool or normal liver parenchyma