Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;104(1):0036850421998485. doi: 10.1177/0036850421998485

Table 1.

Overview of nine lymphedema patients participating in this pilot study.

ID Diagnosis Stage Sex Age(years) Volumereduction (mL) Height(cm) Weight (kg) BMI Abdominalgirth (cm)
1 Secondary benign leglymphedema left II–III f 59 1174 156 66 (−1) 27 (−1) 86
2 Primary leg lymphedemaboth sides III m 59 554 r, 1083 l,total 1637 169 94.2 (−1) 33 112 (+1)
3 Primary leg lymphedema left II f 39 1718 169 65.8 (−2.6) 23 (−1) 83
4 Primary leg lymphedemaboth sides III m 63 3839 r, 4032 l,total 7871 162 140.4 (−8.4) 54 (−3) 138 (−3)
5 Primary leg lymphedemaboth sides II m 25 706 r, 444 l,total 1150 168 60.4 (+1.2) 21 78 (+1)
6 Secondary benign leglymphedemaboth sides II f 67 483 r, 574 l,total 1057 158 58.6 (+1.6) 23 85 (+1)
7 Primary leg lymphedemaboth sides III f 61 5110 r, 4113 l,total 9223 170 104.8 (−9.2) 26 (−3) 116 (−11)
8 Chronic secondary leglymphedemaboth sides II f 58 1075 r, 947 l,total 2022 171 70.4 (−1) 24 87 (−4)
9 Chronic leg lymphedemaboth sides II-III f 65 1937 r, 1331 l,total 3268 155 107.2 (−4.8) 45 (−2) 145 (−2)

Diagnosis, lymphedema stage, sex, age (in years), height and BMI (body mass index) and was determined for each patient prior to the study. Leg volume (l = left, r = right), weight and abdominal girth was assessed before and after complete decongestive therapy. Absolute changes are displayed in the brackets.