Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2022 Dec 29;10(1):17–32. doi: 10.1007/s40471-022-00316-6

Table 2.

Evidence of sociodemographic differences and disparities in ageism

Sociodemographic
characteristic
Differences
%a (n) Group experiencing more ageism or more vulnerable to negative effects associated with ageism*
Sample size b: Small Moderate Large
Age 14 studies assessed

More ageism
57% (8) Older age
14% (2) Younger age
43% (6) No differences
Older age/age group [2, 13, 23, 27 (implicit ageism), 30 (amount), 33, 34, 44]

Younger age/age group [27 (explicit ageism & acknowledgement), 30 (moderation)]

No difference [31, 39, 43, 46, 48, 53]
Sex 14 studies assessed

More ageism
7% (1) Women
29% (4) Men
71% (10) No differences
Women [34]

Men [30, 39, 44 (adjusted model), 55]

No difference [2, 24, 31, 33, 41, 44 (correlation), 46, 48, 51, 53]
Race/ethnicity 12 studies assessed

More ageism
42% (5) racial/ethnic minority group
17% (2) racial/ethnic majority group
75% (9) No differences
Racial/ethnic minority group
  • Non-White [31, 51]

  • African American [55]

  • Hispanic (v. Non-Hispanic Black) [2]

  • Chinese/Korean American (v. African American) [39]

  • Hispanic (v. African American) [39 (unadjusted model)]


Racial/ethnic majority group
  • Non-Hispanic White (v. Non-Hispanic Black) [2]

  • White [44]

  • Non-Hispanic [44 (adjusted model)]


No difference
  • Non-Hispanic White v. Hispanic [2]

  • Other/Multiracial v. Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic [2]

  • Chinese v. Korean American [39]

  • Hispanic v. African American [39 (adjusted model)]

  • Race: [30, 33, 34, 41, 42, 46]

  • Hispanic ethnicity: [34, 41, 44 (correlation)]

Marital status & household composition 3 studies assessed
  • 3 marital status

  • 1 household composition


More ageism
33% (1) not married
67% (2) no difference by marital status

100% (1) no difference by household composition
Not married [30]

No difference by marital status [2, 31]

No difference by household composition
  • Living with others v. alone [31]

Education 11 studies assessed

More ageism
64% (7) less education
18% (2) more education
18% (2) no difference
Less education [2, 30, 33, 39, 44, 51, 53]

More education [41, 43]

No difference [31, 46]
Socioeconomic status 4 studies assessed

More ageism
100% (4) lower socioeconomic status
Lower socioeconomic status
  • <$60k annual household income (v. ≥$60k) [2]

  • Household wealth in 2 quintiles (v. highest quintile) [30]

  • Less wealth [33]

  • Subjective social status [53]

Employment 8 studies assessed
  • 5 employment status

  • 3 employment characteristics


More ageism
40% (2) not employed
60% (3) no difference by employment status

67% (2) some employment characteristics
33% (1) no difference by employment characteristics
Not employed [2, 43]

No difference by employment status [30, 31, 46]

Employment characteristics
  • Early and late career (v. midcareer) [50]

  • Managers, professionals, skilled technical (v. blue collar supervisors) [55]


No difference by employment characteristics
  • Faculty v. administration/staff [36]

Geography 2 studies assessed
  • 1 urbanicity

  • 1 state

  • 1 region


More ageism
100% (1) rural

100% (1) not from Ohio (v. Ohio)

100% (1) Midwest (v. Northeast)
100% (1) no differences between other regions
Rural (v. metro) [2]

Not from Ohio (v. Ohio) [51]

Midwest Region (v. Northeast) [2]

No regional difference
  • Pairwise comparisons of Midwest, West, South, Northeast, with the exception of Midwest v. Northeast [2]

Religion 1 study assessed
  • religiosity

  • religion


More ageism:

100% (1) lower religiosity
100% (1) no difference by religion
Lower religiosity [31]

No difference by religion [31]
Political affiliation 1 study assessed

More ageism:
100% (1) Republicans & Independents
Republican or Independent (v. Demographic or other) [51]
a

Percentile sums may not equal 100 because some studies used multiple strategies generating divergent findings to assess ageism differences for a single sociodemographic characteristic (e.g., examining associations with multiple ageism measures, crude differences, adjusted associations, moderation analyses).

*

All reported differences were statistically significant with p<.05, unless accompanied by † symbol.

Statistical differences not assessed.

b

Sample size classification: small = 101-400; moderate ~1000-2000; large >4000.