Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Adv Healthc Mater. 2022 Dec 23;12(7):e2202221. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202202221

Figure 2: Electrical properties of the scaffold can be adjusted by varying amounts of each carbon nanomaterial, while keeping mechanical properties largely consistent.

Figure 2:

(A) Quantification of the storage modulus (G’), and (B) tan(δ) of the scaffolds with varying amounts of total carbon (graphene flakes and carbon nanotubes) using nanoindentation analysis (N=6 independent gels, n>5 measurements per gel). Gels with 1% (blue) and 2% (red) w/v alginate content are compared. Mean and standard error are shown for each graph. (C) Quantification of the bulk G’ versus % strain, with varying amounts of carbon (%) and with either 1% or 2% w/v alginate. N=4 independent gels for each composition. Legend (right) denotes the alginate w/v % of the composite, and the total amount of additive in the scaffold (%). (D) Quantification of gel conductivity with varying amounts of carbon, for 1% (blue) and 2% (red) w/v alginate. N=5 independent gels for each composition, with n>12 measurements per gel. Mean and s.d. are shown for each graph.