TABLE VI.B. 1.
Evidence for screening for OSA in the primary care setting
Study (authors) | Year | LOE (1a–5) | Study design | Study groups | Clinical endpoints | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jonas et al.458 | 2017 | 2a | SR | 110 Studies (1994–2016) | Association of OSA screening with health outcomes | Insufficient evidence for OSA screening among asymptomatic adults; no studies were found comparing screening to no screening. |
Abrishami et al.429 | 2012 | 2a | SR | 10 studies (1988–2008): one retrospective review, nine prospective cohorts | Sensitivity and specificity values of the Berlin, STOP, STOP-BANG, Wisconsin, and SASDQ questionnaires | Reviewed OSA screening questionnaires show inconsistent predictive values. |
Kee et al.455 | 2018 | 2b | Prospective multicenter cohort | Patients with diagnosed comorbidities (diabetes, obesity, resistant hypertension, and heart failure) and a baseline home sleep study who completed the STOP-BANG, Berlin, and OSA50 questionnaires | Sensitivity and specificity values | STOP-BANG had the best sensitivity for screening purposes in patients with diabetes, obesity, resistant hypertension, and heart failure. |
Silva et al.456 | 2011 | 2b | Prospective multicenter cohort | Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) Participants who completed baseline PSG, 4-Variable Screening Tool, STOP, STOP-BANG, and ESS questionnaires | Sensitivity and specificity values | STOP-BANG had the highest sensitivity while the 4-Variable had the highest specificity for moderate-to-severe OSA. |
Luo et al.457 | 2014 | 2b | Prospective single center cohort | Patients both with and without OSA who completed the STOP, STOP-BANG, Berlin, and ESS questionnaires | Sensitivity and specificity values | STOP-BANG had the highest sensitivity among the reviewed questionnaires. |
Tan et al.454 | 2017 | 2b | Prospective multicenter cohort | Singapore Health Study 2012 (SH2012) participants who completed home sleep study and Berlin questionnaire | Sensitivity and specificity values | Berlin questionnaire possesses a high sensitivity and NPV for severe OSA. |
Senaratna et al.422 | 2017 | 2a | SR and meta-analysis | 35 Studies (2008–2016): 26 prospective cohorts, five retrospective reviews, four cross-sectional analyses | Pooled sensitivity and specificity values of the Berlin questionnaire | Limited evidence to suggest utility of Berlin questionnaire in general population. |
Chiu et al.431 | 2017 | 2a | SR and meta-analysis | 108 Studies (1999–2016) | Pooled sensitivity and specificity values of Berlin, STOP, STOP-BANG, and ESS questionnaires | The STOP-BANG questionnaire is the most accurate tool for detecting mild, moderate, and severe OSA. |
Tan et al.453 | 2016 | 2b | Prospective multicenter cohort | Singapore Health Study 2012 (SH2012) participants who completed home-based sleep study and STOP-BANG questionnaire | Sensitivity and specificity values | STOP-BANG has moderate sensitivity and high NPV for moderate-to-severe OSA. |