TABLE VI.F. 3.
Study | Year | LOE | Study design | Study groups | Clinical end point | Conclusion |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHF | ||||||
Abraham et al.584 | 2006 | 2b | Prospective multicenter study comparing diagnostic accuracy of ClearPath System (CPS) vs. PSG. Stable CHF with EF ≤35% |
Night 1 did both in the lab and Night 2 (<3 nights apart) was home CPS. N = 50 |
RDI as determined by 3% desaturations for respiratory events and “flow change.” | 1) Same night: RDI>5 sens 92%, spec 52%, acc 73%, AUC NR RDI>15 sens 67%, spec 78%, acc 75%, AUC NR 2) Different night: RDI>5 acc 73% RDI>15 acc 77% |
de Vries et al.609 | 2015 | 1b | Prospective single center cross-sectional study in patients with chronic heart failure (stable CHF by clinical judgment). | Subjects underwent the ApneaLink (2 channel – airflow + oximetry) and simultaneous PSG at home. N = 100 |
AHI as determined by respiratory events required 30% drop in airflow and 4% desaturations. | AHI > 5 sens 98%, spec 60%, acc NR, AUC 0.94 AHI>15 sens 92.9%, spec 91.9%, acc NR, AUC 0.94 ICC 0.85 for categories 3) 29% CSA, 19% OSA, 13% mixed 4) Best accuracy at AHI 15. 5) Cannot differentiate CSA vs. OSA |
Araújo et al.607 | 2018 | 3b | Prospective single center cross-sectional study in patients with chronic heart failure (stable CHF by clinical judgment). | Subjects were studied by the ApneaLink (2 channel – airflow + oximetry) and PSG simultaneously during in the sleep laboratory. N = 35 |
AHI as determined by respiratory events required 50% drop in airflow and 3% desaturations. | AHI > 5 sens 81.8%, spec 61.5%, acc 74.2, AUC 0.85 AHI>15 sens 83.3%, spec 91.3%, acc 88.6, AUC 0.93 AHI correlation r = 0.79 Highest accuracy at AHI 15. Cannot differentiate CSA vs. OSA Downgraded due to small number and EF50%. |
Aurora et al.608 | 2018 | 1b | Prospective single center cross sectional study in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure (stabilized at the time of testing). | Subjects underwent concurrent ApneaLink Plus (3 channel – airflow, oximetry and effort belt) and PSG. Recordings blindly scored for OSA and CSA. N = 57 |
AHI as determined by respiratory events that required a 50% drop in airflow and 3% desaturations (PSG allowed arousals). | AHI > 5 sens 95.8%, spec 80.0%, acc NR, AUC NR Central AHI>5 sens 90.9%, spec 100%, acc NR, AUC NR 3) ICC 0.89 for categories, Obs AHI r = 0.91, Central AHI r = 0.99 58.5% central AHI > 5 4) Higher accuracy for central vs. obstructive. 5) Cannot differentiate CSA vs. OSA. |
Savage et al.610 | 2016 | 1b | Prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Stable CHF patients with an EF<45%. | Subjects underwent simultaneous Sleep Minder (airflow + movement via electromagnetic signals) and PSG. Development (D) (n = 28) and validation (V) (n = 47) groups were studied. N = 75 |
AHI as determined by Sleep Minder (SM) required 50% reduction in airflow only. PSG required 30% drop in flow and 4% desaturations. | AHI > 5 sens NR, spec NR, acc NR, AUC NR AHI>15 sens 70%, spec 89%, acc NR, AUC 0.85. AUC 0.85 for all, 19% misclassified (> <AHI 15) by SM. 25%/34% (D/V) with OSA, 11%/9% with CSA. Best accuracy at AHI >30. Cannot differentiate CSA vs. OSA. |
COPD | ||||||
Chang et al.611 | 2019 | 1b | Prospective single center cross-sectional study in outpatients with stable COPD and symptoms of OSA. | Subjects did 1 night with Nox-T3 and then an in-lab PSG with simultaneous Nox-T3 within 1 week. N = 90 |
AHI as determined by 2 different definitions for respiratory events: 1) Nox-T3 and PSG respiratory events required 30% drop in airflow and 4% desaturation, and 2) Nox-T3 and PSG respiratory events required 30% drop in airflow and 3% desaturation or, for PSG, an arousal. | Same night 4%: AHI>5 sens 96%, spec 84%, kappa 0.82 AHI>15 sens 95%, spec 98%, kappa 0.93 Different night 4%: AHI>5 sens 95%, spec 78%, kappa 0.75 AHI>15 sens 74%, spec 98%, kappa 0.74 Same night 3% kappa AHI>5 0.58, kappa AHI>15 0.88 Different night 3% kappa AHI>5 0.48, kappa AHI>15 0.70 Nox-T3 more often found hypoxemia (15 vs. 5 with AHI < 5 and > 5 min with sats ≤88%.) |
Jen et al.612 | 2020 | 3b | Prospective single center cross-sectional study in outpatients > 40 years old with stable Gold II and III COPD and OSA symptoms. | In random order, subjects underwent 1 night PSG and WatchPAT device in the lab and another night with the WatchPAT at home. N = 33 |
AHI as determined by WatchPAT and PSG. WatchPAT uses PAT with either a 3% with “arousal” or 4% desaturation. PSG required 50% drop in airflow without desaturation or arousals |
AHI>5 sens 96%, spec 55.6% AHI>15 sens 92.3%, spec 65.0% 3)Intraindividual AHI difference 78.8% concordance (AHI>15 and difference <10) |
CVA | ||||||
Chernyshev et al.614 | 2015 | 2b | Prospective single center cross-sectional study of inpatients admitted for acute ischemic stroke. Studied within 72 h of the CVA. | Subjects underwent a simultaneous PSG and HSAT within 3 days of their CVA. N = 21 BMI 33.1 (OSA) vs. 23.8 (no OSA), 66.6% had an AHI > 5, 48% had OSA, 19% had CSA |
AHI as determined by HSAT and PSG. Respiratory events required 30% drop and 4% desaturation. | For OSA only: AHI>5 sens 100%, spec 85.7%, acc NR, AUC 1.0 AHI>15 sens 100%, spec 83.9%, acc NR, AUC 0.95 Intraindividual AHI difference 1.5 Downgraded due to small number. |
Failed HSAT | ||||||
Zeidler et al.615 | 2015 | 2b | Retrospective single center review of patients referred for OSA evaluation who had a technically inadequate (N = 111) or normal HSAT (N = 127) but then had a subsequent PSG. | All had a high pretest probability of OSA. N = 238 |
Respiratory events scoring criteria not defined for HSAT or PSG. OSA defined by an AHI > 5. | 1) Technically inadequate HSAT: 71% with OSA: 38.7% mild, 32.4% moderate/severe 2) Normal HSATs: 24% OSA: 18.1% mild, 5.5% moderate/severe Older age and lower ESS were associated with OSA on PSG. |