Table 1.

An overview of phenotypical characteristics associated with recruited probands, and the foveal morphology description of their biological parents

Probands											Parents
			Best-corrected VA								Foveal hypoplasia6 7
ID	Gender	Age (at examination)	BE	RE	LE	VA test	Nystagmus	Iris transillumination defect2	VEP	Foveal hypoplasia6 7	Mother	Father
1	M	5	0.275	0.45	0.275	Crowded Kay Pictures	Present	Grade 1	NT	Grade 1a	Grade 1a	N
2	F	4	0.85	0.85	0.95	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 4	Misrouting	Grade 3	N	N
3	F	15	0.18	0.18	0.18	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 2	Misrouting	Grade 2	N	NT
4	M	5	0.625	0.75	0.825	Crowded Kay Pictures	Present	Grade 3	Misrouting	Grade 3	Grade 1b	N
5	F	21	0.6	0.78	0.6	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 3	Misrouting	Grade 4	N	NT
6	F	22	0.6	0.78	0.6	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 2	Misrouting	Grade 3	N	Grade 1a
7	F	13	0.34	0.4	0.4	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 2	NT	Grade 4	N	N
8	M	13	0.6	0.64	0.74	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 2	Misrouting	Grade 3	N	NT
9	M	22	0.48	0.6	0.48	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 3	NT	Grade 3	NT	N
10	M	24	0.48	0.6	0.6	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 3	Misrouting	Grade 3	Grade 1a	N
11	M	5	0.9	0.085	0.9	Crowded Kay Pictures	Present	Grade 3	Inconclusive	Grade 3	Grade 1b	N
12	F	10	1.2	1.2	1.28	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 3	Misrouting	Grade 4	Grade 1a	N
13	F	4	0.7	0.8	0.75	Crowded Kay Pictures	Present	Grade 4	NT	Grade 3	Grade 1a	N
14	F	3	0.6	NT	NT	Crowded Kay Pictures	Present	Grade 1	Inconclusive	Grade 4	N	Grade 1a
15	M	9	0.78	0.78	0.78	Crowded Keeler	Present	Grade 2	NT	Grade 4	N	N
16	M	3	0.55	0.7	0.575	Crowded Kay Pictures	Present	Grade 2	NT	Grade 3	Grade 1a	N

BE, both eyes; F, female; LE, left eye; M, male; N, normal; NT, not tested; RE, right eye; VA, visual acuity in logMAR; VEP, visual evoked potentia.