Fig. 3.

A linear mixed effects model revealed a significant three-way interaction of Group*Movement*Stimulus and significant two-way Site*Movement and Group*Site interactions. Group*Movement*Stimulus (Overall panel): The CUD group but not the CON group was significantly slower to avoid compared to approach the cannabis stimuli but no the neutral stimuli. Site*movement: TX site was faster to respond on avoid trials than the NL site. Group*Site: The TX-CUD group was faster to respond across all trials compared to the NL-CUD group. The NL-CUD group was slower than the NL-CON group, while the TX-CUD and TX-CON groups did not significantly differ. Error bar based on standard error.