Table 4.
Reference | Comparison | Mean Difference | SE | t | p bonf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CUD, Neutral, Approach | CON, Neutral, Approach | −0.04 | 0.01 | −3.33 | 0.027 |
CUD, Cannabis, Approach | −0.01 | 0.01 | −1.76 | 1 | |
CON, Cannabis, Approach | −0.03 | 0.01 | −2.75 | 0.175 | |
CUD, Neutral, Avoid | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.65 | 1 | |
CON, Neutral, Avoid | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.44 | 1 | |
CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.03 | 0.01 | 4.11 | 0.001 | |
CON, Cannabis, Avoid | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.73 | 1 | |
CON, Neutral, Approach | CUD, Cannabis, Approach | 0.03 | 0.01 | 2.42 | 0.449 |
CON, Cannabis, Approach | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.98 | 1 | |
CUD, Neutral, Avoid | 0.05 | 0.01 | 3.75 | 0.006 | |
CON, Neutral, Avoid | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.54 | 0.32 | |
CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.07 | 0.01 | 5.83 | < 0.001 | |
CON, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.30 | 0.625 | |
CUD, Cannabis, Approach | CON, Cannabis, Approach | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.84 | 1 |
CUD, Neutral, Avoid | 0.02 | 0.01 | 2.19 | 0.829 | |
CON, Neutral, Avoid | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.53 | 1 | |
CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.04 | 0.01 | 5.27 | < 0.001 | |
CON, Cannabis, Avoid | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.82 | 1 | |
CON, Cannabis, Approach | CUD, Neutral, Avoid | 0.04 | 0.01 | 3.17 | 0.046 |
CON, Neutral, Avoid | 0.02 | 0.01 | 1.88 | 1 | |
CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.06 | 0.01 | 5.25 | < 0.001 | |
CON, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.01 | 0.01 | 1.38 | 1 | |
CUD, Neutral, Avoid | CON, Neutral, Avoid | −0.02 | 0.01 | −1.86 | 1 |
CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.03 | 0.01 | 4.03 | 0.002 | |
CON, Cannabis, Avoid | −0.03 | 0.01 | −2.15 | 0.903 | |
CON, Neutral, Avoid | CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.05 | 0.01 | 3.95 | 0.003 |
CON, Cannabis, Avoid | 0.00 | 0.01 | −0.48 | 1 | |
CUD, Cannabis, Avoid | CON, Cannabis, Avoid | −0.05 | 0.01 | −4.23 | < 0.001 |
Note. CUD = Group with cannabis use disorder; CON = non-using controls. P-value Bonferroni-corrected for 28 comparisons.