Table 3.
How do IRBs that use outside experts identify them (N = 306).
n* | % | |
---|---|---|
Identify a known subject matter expert | 255 | 83.3% |
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from within the organization that are not current IRB members | 152 | 49.7% |
Receive a word of mouth referral | 107 | 35.0% |
Request Former IRB Member serve as consultant | 100 | 32.7% |
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from affiliated organizations (e.g., Cancer Center, pediatric hospital) | 77 | 25.2% |
Request that an IRB member on another IRB panel within our institution, who has the needed expertise, serve as consultant | 62 | 20.3% |
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from the Principal Investigator | 49 | 16.0% |
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from a professional network/organization/forum | 42 | 13.7% |
Seek assistance or request consult from a similar project or institutional advisory committee | 33 | 10.8% |
Search publicly available information to identify experts or thought leaders in the domain/field | 33 | 10.8% |
Seek assistance or request consult from a Community Advisory Board | 28 | 9.2% |
Other [write in] | 23 | 7.5% |
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from federal regulatory agencies (e.g. OHRP, FDA) | 15 | 4.9% |
Respondents were allowed to choose multiple responses.