Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 21.
Published in final edited form as: AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jun 24;13(4):251–262. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2090459

Table 3.

How do IRBs that use outside experts identify them (N = 306).

n* %
Identify a known subject matter expert 255 83.3%
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from within the organization that are not current IRB members 152 49.7%
Receive a word of mouth referral 107 35.0%
Request Former IRB Member serve as consultant 100 32.7%
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from affiliated organizations (e.g., Cancer Center, pediatric hospital) 77 25.2%
Request that an IRB member on another IRB panel within our institution, who has the needed expertise, serve as consultant 62 20.3%
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from the Principal Investigator 49 16.0%
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from a professional network/organization/forum 42 13.7%
Seek assistance or request consult from a similar project or institutional advisory committee 33 10.8%
Search publicly available information to identify experts or thought leaders in the domain/field 33 10.8%
Seek assistance or request consult from a Community Advisory Board 28 9.2%
Other [write in] 23 7.5%
Request suggestions for potential reviewers from federal regulatory agencies (e.g. OHRP, FDA) 15 4.9%
*

Respondents were allowed to choose multiple responses.