Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 30;15(28):33732–33743. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c04789

Table 2. Sensing Parameters of Different CO2 Sensors Based on MOX Semiconductors.

sensing material synthesis route operating temperature [°C] response at concentration [ppm] operating condition reference
ZnO/CuO nanorods hydrothermal RT 0.09 at 1000a dry (16)
5wt%Sn-CdO nanopowders co-precipitating 250 1.18 at 5000b* dry (17)
CuO@1wt%Ag-BaTiO3 spheres decorated mixing 120 0.60 at 1000a* dry (18)
CeO2 yolk-shell nanospheres solvothermal 100 3.98 at 2400c negligible response below 70 RH% (19)
Nd2O2CO3 nanoparticles sol–gel 350 4.00 at 1000d negligible response below 50 RH% (20)
CaO-In2O3 mesoporous impregnation 230 1.80 at 2000d dry (21)
N-ZnO nanoparticles sol–gel 250 4.50 at 2000d* dry (61)
Na:In2O3 nanoparticles sol–gel 200 7.10 at 1000e uniform response above 15 RH% this work
a

Inline graphic, where R is the resistance (Rgas, resistance in CO2 atmosphere; Rair, resistance in carrier gas). The asterisk denotes a value not explicitly stated in the study but approximated from a graphical plot.

b

Inline graphic, where R is the resistance (Rgas, resistance in CO2 atmosphere; Rair, resistance in carrier gas).

c

Inline graphic, where R is the resistance (Rgas, resistance in CO2 atmosphere; Rair, resistance in carrier gas).

d

Inline graphic, where R is the resistance (Rgas, resistance in CO2 atmosphere; Rair, resistance in carrier gas). The asterisk denotes a value not explicitly stated in the study but approximated from a graphical plot.

e

Inline graphic, where G is the conductance (Ggas, conductance in CO2 atmosphere; Gair, conductance in carrier gas).