Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;18(11):2449–2458. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.371370

Additional Table 2.

Information of different clusters during fMRI comparisons.

ROI CSD+eGFP >Con+eGFP CSD+eGFP >Con+eGFP CSD+Sirt6>CSD+eGFP CSD+eGFP >CSD+Sirt6




Voxel t-value X Y Z Voxel t-value X Y Z Voxel t-value X Y Z Voxel t-value X Y Z
Cluster1 6421 5.512 -1.295 5.285 1.901 1115 2.949 -0.918 3.715 3.291 7550 5.358 -1.027 1.026 -5.915 662 3.227 -3.622 3.403 -5.057
Cluster2 2356 3.281 1.778 1.422 -7.091 513 3.136 1.995 5.678 -5.392 5729 5.012 1.585 2.279 4.092 504 3.083 -0.231 5.223 -1.865
Cluster3 2162 3.611 -0.356 0.651 2.546 376 2.783 -1.095 6.005 -5.852 2659 5.115 -1.589 4.603 2.481 242 4.598 2.958 5.215 -4.341
Cluster4 385 2.685 -2.657 2.999 -7.769 288 2.535 3.342 5.080 -1.639 678 3.513 -2.662 2.873 2.696 201 2.627 2.075 3.106 -2.014
Cluster5 325 2.607 3.239 3.442 -7.539 267 2.106 0.627 3.699 3.406 637 3.832 2.844 2.020 -7.203 145 2.897 -0.724 4.046 5.177
Cluster6 172 2.638 -0.351 1.766 5.265 215 3.520 3.431 3.446 -5.893 480 2.486 -1.319 1.287 4.085 143 3.027 -3.611 5.191 -6.211
Cluster7 154 2.631 0.416 0.337 1.130 210 3.436 -2.481 0.416 -1.451 356 2.368 0.436 3.926 2.116 139 3.632 -3.817 3.032 -6.002
Cluster8 110 2.388 -2.839 5.352 -2.094 179 2.242 0.934 5.824 -8.093 293 2.284 -0.040 4.546 -7.284
Cluster9 162 2.301 -1.008 4.170 -6.934 206 3.479 -2.460 3.864 -5.642
Cluster10 146 2.774 -2.453 5.046 -6.568 174 3.207 -2.664 1.881 -5.901
Cluster11 125 2.414 -1.290 5.595 -7.386 141 4.441 -0.358 0.000 -2.519
Cluster12 113 2.222 0.723 2.883 -7.189 138 3.411 2.087 5.298 -0.222
Cluster13 115 2.328 -1.889 2.466 -3.191
Cluster14 104 2.556 -0.343 2.206 -8.254
Totalsize 12085 3709 19260 2036

Cluster: The different fMRI signals were clustered together, and generated different clusters during the comparisons; CSD: chronic sleep deprivation; eGFP: enhanced green fluorescent protein; fMRI: functional magnetic resonance imaging; ROI: region of interest; Sirt6: Sirtuins 6; X, Y, Z: the zero location is bregma